These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31203453)
1. Integrating fuzzy logic with Pearson correlation to optimize contaminant detection in water distribution system with uncertainty analyses. Osmani SA; Banik BK; Ali H Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jun; 191(7):441. PubMed ID: 31203453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multivariate based event detection method and performance comparison with two baseline methods. Liu S; Smith K; Che H Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():109-18. PubMed ID: 25996758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computationally efficient approach for identification of fuzzy dynamic groundwater sampling network. Kumari K; Jain S; Dhar A Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Apr; 191(5):310. PubMed ID: 31030264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why conventional detection methods fail in identifying the existence of contamination events. Liu S; Li R; Smith K; Che H Water Res; 2016 Apr; 93():222-229. PubMed ID: 26905801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A fuzzy multi-objective optimization approach for treated wastewater allocation. Tayebikhorami S; Nikoo MR; Sadegh M Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jun; 191(7):468. PubMed ID: 31243555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Groundwater health risk assessment and its temporal and spatial evolution based on trapezoidal fuzzy number-Monte Carlo stochastic simulation: A case study in western Jilin province. Li T; Bian J; Ruan D; Xu L; Zhang S Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Sep; 282():116736. PubMed ID: 39024949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A method of detecting contamination events using multiple conventional water quality sensors. Liu S; Che H; Smith K; Chen C Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Jan; 187(1):4189. PubMed ID: 25467418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Network hydraulics inclusion in water quality event detection using multiple sensor stations data. Oliker N; Ostfeld A Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():47-58. PubMed ID: 25996752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contamination event detection using multiple types of conventional water quality sensors in source water. Liu S; Che H; Smith K; Chen L Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Aug; 16(8):2028-38. PubMed ID: 24953418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A fuzzy multi-stakeholder socio-optimal model for water and waste load allocation. Ghorbani Mooselu M; Nikoo MR; Sadegh M Environ Monit Assess; 2019 May; 191(6):359. PubMed ID: 31073749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A canonical correlation analysis based method for contamination event detection in water sources. Li R; Liu S; Smith K; Che H Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Jun; 18(6):658-66. PubMed ID: 27264637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selecting the best location of water quality sensors in water distribution networks by considering the importance of nodes and contaminations using NSGA-III (case study: Zahedan water distribution network, Iran). Harif S; Azizyan G; Dehghani Darmian M; Givehchi M Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(18):53229-53252. PubMed ID: 36853532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Water quality analysis in rivers with non-parametric probability distributions and fuzzy inference systems: application to the Cauca River, Colombia. Ocampo-Duque W; Osorio C; Piamba C; Schuhmacher M; Domingo JL Environ Int; 2013 Feb; 52():17-28. PubMed ID: 23266912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A real time method of contaminant classification using conventional water quality sensors. Liu S; Che H; Smith K; Chang T J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():13-21. PubMed ID: 25700352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fuzzy-stochastic characterization of site uncertainty and variability in groundwater flow and contaminant transport through a heterogeneous aquifer. Zhang K; Li H; Achari G J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):73-82. PubMed ID: 19217686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncertainty characterization approaches for risk assessment of DBPs in drinking water: a review. Chowdhury S; Champagne P; McLellan PJ J Environ Manage; 2009 Apr; 90(5):1680-91. PubMed ID: 19167150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Locating monitoring wells in groundwater systems using embedded optimization and simulation models. Bashi-Azghadi SN; Kerachian R Sci Total Environ; 2010 Apr; 408(10):2189-98. PubMed ID: 20189633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An integrated logit model for contamination event detection in water distribution systems. Housh M; Ostfeld A Water Res; 2015 May; 75():210-23. PubMed ID: 25770443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a fuzzy-stochastic nonlinear model to incorporate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. Li H; Zhang K J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jan; 111(1-4):1-12. PubMed ID: 19945767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of water quality in Er-longshan reservoir by fuzzy model. Zhang Y; Fan CH; Diao Z; Peng XR; Bai X Interdiscip Sci; 2009 Mar; 1(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 20640816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]