These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31203907)

  • 1. Photogrammetry as an alternative for acquiring digital dental models: A proof of concept.
    Stuani VT; Ferreira R; Manfredi GGP; Cardoso MV; Sant'Ana ACP
    Med Hypotheses; 2019 Jul; 128():43-49. PubMed ID: 31203907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.
    Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical photogrammetric method to measure dental arch dimensions and mesio-distal tooth size.
    Normando D; da Silva PL; Mendes ÁM
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):721-6. PubMed ID: 21282283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The application of multi-baseline digital close-range photogrammetry in three-dimensional imaging and measurement of dental casts.
    Fu X; Peng C; Li Z; Liu S; Tan M; Song J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178858. PubMed ID: 28640827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
    Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photogrammetry and conventional impressions for recording implant positions: a comparative laboratory study.
    Ortorp A; Jemt T; Bäck T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15903174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital macro-photogrammetry in orthodontic tooth movement: case report.
    Hlongwa P; Sander FG; Geiger M
    SADJ; 2007 Nov; 62(10):446-7, 450. PubMed ID: 18500106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of linear measurements and analyses taken from plaster models and three-dimensional images.
    Porto BG; Porto TS; Silva MB; Grehs RA; Pinto Ados S; Bhandi SH; Tonetto MR; Bandéca MC; dos Santos-Pinto LA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 25825090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tooth size and dental arch dimensions: a stereophotogrammetric study in Southeast Asian Malays.
    Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Anderson PJ; Townsend GC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 22008304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A critical assessment of the potential for Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry to produce high fidelity 3D dental models.
    Silvester CM; Hillson S
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Oct; 173(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 32748988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.
    Sousa MV; Vasconcelos EC; Janson G; Garib D; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Dental Models: Is Photogrammetry an Alternative to Dental Extraoral and Intraoral Scanners?
    Zotti F; Rosolin L; Bersani M; Poscolere A; Pappalardo D; Zerman N
    Dent J (Basel); 2022 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 35200249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
    Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses.
    Naidu D; Scott J; Ong D; Ho CT
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 20043542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
    Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Assessment of precision and accuracy of digital surface photogrammetry with the DSP 400 system].
    Krimmel M; Kluba S; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Mar; 50(3):45-53. PubMed ID: 15832575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-Dimensional Pathology Specimen Modeling Using "Structure-From-Motion" Photogrammetry: A Powerful New Tool for Surgical Pathology.
    Turchini J; Buckland ME; Gill AJ; Battye S
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Nov; 142(11):1415-1420. PubMed ID: 29846102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of depth in eye distance measurements: comparison of single and stereo-photogrammetry.
    Douglas TS; Meintjes EM; Vaughan CL; Viljoen DL
    Am J Hum Biol; 2003; 15(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 12820199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical note: 3D from standard digital photography of human crania-a preliminary assessment.
    Katz D; Friess M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 May; 154(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 24711122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.