357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31204330)
1. Shaping Ability of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne Primary in Severely Curved Resin Blocks.
Tavanafar S; Gilani PV; Saleh AM; Schäfer E
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 31204330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals.
Wu H; Peng C; Bai Y; Hu X; Wang L; Li C
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Mar; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25886847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Root Canal Surface Strain and Canal Center Transportation Induced by 3 Different Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instrument Systems.
Liu W; Wu B
J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 26686822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shaping Ability of ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and Reciproc in Simulated Root Canals.
Maia Filho EM; Dos Reis Santos RM; Lima DM; da Silva Pereira SM; Soares JA; de Jesus Tavarez RR; Ferreira MC; Carvalho CN; Bandeca MC; Tonetto MR; Borges AH; de Castro Rizzi C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):902-906. PubMed ID: 27965498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Shaping Characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper Universal in Curved Canals.
Gagliardi J; Versiani MA; de Sousa-Neto MD; Plazas-Garzon A; Basrani B
J Endod; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1718-24. PubMed ID: 26321062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative transportation assessment in curved canals prepared with an off-centered rectangular design system.
Silva EJ; Vieira VC; Tameirão MD; Belladonna FG; Neves Ade A; Souza EM; DE-Deus G
Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30(1):e43. PubMed ID: 27191737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparative Study of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next Used by Undergraduate Students to Prepare Root Canals.
Alemam AAH; Dummer PMH; Farnell DJJ
J Endod; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1364-1369. PubMed ID: 28606667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion.
Giuliani V; Di Nasso L; Pace R; Pagavino G
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1468-71. PubMed ID: 25146035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education.
Çelik G; Özdemir Kısacık F; Yılmaz EF; Mersinlioğlu A; Ertuğrul İF; Orhan H
PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7419. PubMed ID: 31489262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Analysis of Three Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files in Severely Curved L-Shaped Root Canals: Preparation Time, Aberrations, and Fracture Rates.
Almnea RA; Mohammad Al Ageel Albeaji S; Ali Alelyani A; AlHarith D; Saeed Alshahrani A; Al Malwi AA; Alobaid MA; Al Moaleem MM
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2024; 16():1-9. PubMed ID: 38384359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of the shaping ability of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in the preparation of simulated curved root canals].
Qiu N; Wang CY; Liu YF; Yu XQ; Xue M
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Apr; 25(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 27329883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of two different nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals of extracted human molar teeth.
Ferrara G; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Ceci C; Del Fabbro M; Machtou P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26343421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Centering Ability of ProTaper Next and WaveOne Classic in J-Shape Simulated Root Canals.
Troiano G; Dioguardi M; Cocco A; Giuliani M; Fabiani C; D'Alessandro A; Ciavarella D; Lo Muzio L
ScientificWorldJournal; 2016; 2016():1606013. PubMed ID: 28054031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
