These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31204799)

  • 1. Rationalization and Reflection Differentially Modulate Prior Attitudes Toward the Purity Domain.
    Hannikainen IR; Rosas A
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Jun; 43(6):e12747. PubMed ID: 31204799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts.
    Chakroff A; Dungan J; Koster-Hale J; Brown A; Saxe R; Young L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Mar; 11(3):476-84. PubMed ID: 26628642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judgments of moral responsibility and wrongness for intentional and accidental harm and purity violations.
    Parkinson M; Byrne RMJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 28059634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tainting the soul: purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide.
    Rottman J; Kelemen D; Young L
    Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 24333538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anger, disgust, and presumption of harm as reactions to taboo-breaking behaviors.
    Gutierrez R; Giner-Sorolla R
    Emotion; 2007 Nov; 7(4):853-68. PubMed ID: 18039054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link.
    Schein C; Ritter RS; Gray K
    Emotion; 2016 Sep; 16(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 27100369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is purity a distinct and homogeneous domain in moral psychology?
    Kollareth D; Brownell H; Durán JI; Russell JA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):211-235. PubMed ID: 35901410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asking 'why?' enhances theory of mind when evaluating harm but not purity violations.
    Dungan JA; Young L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 14(7):699-708. PubMed ID: 31269193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes.
    Helzer EG; Pizarro DA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Apr; 22(4):517-22. PubMed ID: 21421934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Many moral buttons or just one? Evidence from emotional facial expressions.
    Franchin L; Geipel J; Hadjichristidis C; Surian L
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Aug; 33(5):943-958. PubMed ID: 30200861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harming ourselves and defiling others: what determines a moral domain?
    Chakroff A; Dungan J; Young L
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74434. PubMed ID: 24040245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains.
    Young L; Saxe R
    Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 21601839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imagine no religion: Heretical disgust, anger and the symbolic purity of mind.
    Ritter RS; Preston JL; Salomon E; Relihan-Johnson D
    Cogn Emot; 2016; 30(4):778-96. PubMed ID: 25899719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Harmful situations, impure people: an attribution asymmetry across moral domains.
    Chakroff A; Young L
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():30-7. PubMed ID: 25490126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32-70. PubMed ID: 28504021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in moral judgment competence are related to activity of the prefrontal cortex when attributing blame to evil intention.
    Li X; Yang J; Li P; Li H
    Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(4):438-48. PubMed ID: 26569419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Specks of Dirt and Tons of Pain: Dosage Distinguishes Impurity From Harm.
    Rottman J; Young L
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1151-1160. PubMed ID: 31242081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?
    Haidt J; Koller SH; Dias MG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1993 Oct; 65(4):613-28. PubMed ID: 8229648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protecting the Innocence of Youth: Moral Sanctity Values Underlie Censorship From Young Children.
    Anderson RA; Masicampo EJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1503-1518. PubMed ID: 28914136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.