245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31204844)
1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony.
Marsh HW; Guo J; Dicke T; Parker PD; Craven RG
Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):102-119. PubMed ID: 31204844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
Marsh HW; Morin AJ; Parker PD; Kaur G
Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2014; 10():85-110. PubMed ID: 24313568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Illustration of the Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) Framework on the Passion Scale.
Tóth-Király I; Bõthe B; Rigó A; Orosz G
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1968. PubMed ID: 29163325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigating the Dimensionality of Early Numeracy Using the Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework.
Dierendonck C; de Chambrier AF; Fagnant A; Luxembourger C; Tinnes-Vigne M; Poncelet D
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():680124. PubMed ID: 34239484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When and how to use set-exploratory structural equation modelling to test structural models: A tutorial using the R package lavaan.
Marsh H; Alamer A
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38361388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploratory structural equation modeling of personality data.
Booth T; Hughes DJ
Assessment; 2014 Jun; 21(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 24682748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.
Marsh HW; Lüdtke O; Muthén B; Asparouhov T; Morin AJ; Trautwein U; Nagengast B
Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):471-91. PubMed ID: 20822261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploratory structural equation modeling: a streamlined step by step approach using the R Project software.
Prokofieva M; Zarate D; Parker A; Palikara O; Stavropoulos V
BMC Psychiatry; 2023 Jul; 23(1):546. PubMed ID: 37507658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) to Examine the Internal Structure of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms.
Fresno A; Arias V; Núñez D; Spencer R; Ramos N; Espinoza C; Bravo P; Arriagada J; Brunet A
Span J Psychol; 2020 Nov; 23():e48. PubMed ID: 33176894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing the Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Gender of the Big Five Inventory Through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.
Chiorri C; Marsh HW; Ubbiali A; Donati D
J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 25932664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling: A meta-analytic review of model fit.
Gegenfurtner A
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1037111. PubMed ID: 36389589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coaching efficacy and exploratory structural equation modeling: a substantive-methodological synergy.
Myers ND; Chase MA; Pierce SW; Martin E
J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2011 Dec; 33(6):779-806. PubMed ID: 22262705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Basic Psychological Needs Scale in three South African samples: A bifactor exploratory structural equation modelling approach.
Cromhout A; Schutte L; Wissing MP
Psychol Rep; 2022 Oct; 125(5):2760-2787. PubMed ID: 34176348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploratory structural equation modeling for event-related potential data-An all-in-one approach?
Scharf F; Nestler S
Psychophysiology; 2019 Mar; 56(3):e13303. PubMed ID: 30537207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The factor structure of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Serbia: an evaluation using exploratory structural equation modeling.
Joshanloo M; Jovanović V
J Ment Health; 2017 Dec; 26(6):510-515. PubMed ID: 27690711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects.
Marsh HW; Nagengast B; Morin AJS
Dev Psychol; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1194-1218. PubMed ID: 22250996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating the Applicability of Alignment-A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
Wen C; Hu F
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():845721. PubMed ID: 35814060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: two wrongs do not make a right--camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models.
Marsh HW; Lüdtke O; Nagengast B; Morin AJ; Von Davier M
Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):257-84. PubMed ID: 23834417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Quest for Comparability: Studying the Invariance of the Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy (TSES) Measure across Countries.
Scherer R; Jansen M; Nilsen T; Areepattamannil S; Marsh HW
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150829. PubMed ID: 26959236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison of Reliability Estimation Based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Exploratory Structural Equation Models.
Fu Y; Wen Z; Wang Y
Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Apr; 82(2):205-224. PubMed ID: 35185157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
