These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31206760)

  • 1. Quality of web pages about second-trimester medical abortion: A cross-sectional study of readability, comprehensiveness, and transparency.
    Georgsson S; van der Spoel L; Ferm J; Carlsson T
    J Adv Nurs; 2019 Nov; 75(11):2683-2691. PubMed ID: 31206760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
    Eriksson C; Skinstad M; Georgsson S; Carlsson T
    Reprod Health; 2019 Nov; 16(1):172. PubMed ID: 31775765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readability of web-based sources about induced abortion: a cross-sectional study.
    Georgsson S; Carlsson T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jun; 20(1):102. PubMed ID: 32503524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.
    Thompson AE; Graydon SL
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19004031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The quality and readability of online consumer information about gynecologic cancer.
    Sobota A; Ozakinci G
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):537-41. PubMed ID: 25647257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient Information Websites About Medically Induced Second-Trimester Abortions: A Descriptive Study of Quality, Suitability, and Issues.
    Carlsson T; Axelsson O
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):e8. PubMed ID: 28073735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of consumer-oriented websites containing information about the second trimester ultrasound examination during pregnancy.
    Georgsson S; Carlsson T
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Apr; 20(1):235. PubMed ID: 32321482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Search Engine Ranking, Quality, and Content of Web Pages That Are Critical Versus Noncritical of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.
    Fu LY; Zook K; Spoehr-Labutta Z; Hu P; Joseph JG
    J Adolesc Health; 2016 Jan; 58(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 26559742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of websites with patient information about spinal cord injury in Spanish.
    Bea-Muñoz M; Medina-Sánchez M; Flórez-García MT
    Spinal Cord; 2016 Jul; 54(7):540-5. PubMed ID: 26481713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Googling endometriosis: a systematic review of information available on the Internet.
    Hirsch M; Aggarwal S; Barker C; Davis CJ; Duffy JMN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):451-458.e1. PubMed ID: 27840143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. UK Internet antenatal dietary advice: a content accuracy and readability analysis.
    Sidnell A; Nestel P
    Br J Nutr; 2020 Nov; 124(10):1061-1068. PubMed ID: 32536348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?
    Sacks S; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fifteen-year trend in information on the World Wide Web for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evolving, but opportunities for improvement remain.
    Castillo-Ortiz JD; de Jesus Valdivia-Nuno J; Ramirez-Gomez A; Garagarza-Mariscal H; Gallegos-Rios C; Flores-Hernandez G; Hernandez-Sanchez L; Brambila-Barba V; Castaneda-Sanchez JJ; Barajas-Ochoa Z; Suarez-Rico A; Sanchez-Gonzalez JM; Ramos-Remus C
    Rheumatol Int; 2016 Sep; 36(9):1281-9. PubMed ID: 27295190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-orientated web sites on laryngectomy: is their information readable?
    Pothier L; Pothier DD
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Nov; 18(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 19549174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Higher readability of institutional websites drives the correct fruition of the abortion pathway: A cross-sectional study.
    Ferrari A; Pirrotta L; Bonciani M; Venturi G; Vainieri M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277342. PubMed ID: 36331935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can consumers trust web-based information about celiac disease? Accuracy, comprehensiveness, transparency, and readability of information on the internet.
    McNally SL; Donohue MC; Newton KP; Ogletree SP; Conner KK; Ingegneri SE; Kagnoff MF
    Interact J Med Res; 2012 Apr; 1(1):e1. PubMed ID: 23611901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
    Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health literacy and the Internet: a study on the readability of Australian online health information.
    Cheng C; Dunn M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Aug; 39(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 25716142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uterine Artery Embolization: An Analysis of Online Patient Information Quality and Readability with Historical Comparison.
    Murray TE; Mansoor T; Bowden DJ; O'Neill DC; Lee MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 29331361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.