These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31206914)

  • 21. Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Gingival Displacement Using Three Recent Gingival Retraction Systems -
    Qureshi SM; Anasane NS; Kakade D
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2020; 11(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 33110305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficiency of Cordless Versus Cord Techniques of Gingival Retraction: A Systematic Review.
    Huang C; Somar M; Li K; Mohadeb JVN
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Apr; 26(3):177-185. PubMed ID: 26378615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials.
    Goutham GB; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A; Ramanna PK; Joy J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 29807958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow.
    Polat NT; Ozdemir AK; Turgut M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17319365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gingival displacement using diode laser or retraction cords: A comparative clinical study.
    Melilli D; Mauceri R; Albanese A; Matranga D; Pizzo G
    Am J Dent; 2018 Jun; 31(3):131-134. PubMed ID: 30028930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative evaluation of amount of gingival displacement produced by four different gingival displacement agents - An
    Kesari ZI; Karani JT; Mistry SS; Pai AR
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(4):313-323. PubMed ID: 31649440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative evaluation of the amount of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction systems: An in vivo study.
    Chaudhari J; Prajapati P; Patel J; Sethuraman R; Naveen YG
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 26097353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative evaluation of three noninvasive gingival displacement systems: An
    Thimmappa M; Bhatia M; Somani P; Kumar DRV
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):122-130. PubMed ID: 29692565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang Y; Fan F; Li X; Zhou Q; He B; Huang X; Huang S; Ma J
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(3):234-244. PubMed ID: 30773575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Four Different Gingival Retraction Systems: An In Vivo Study.
    Madaan R; Paliwal J; Sharma V; Meena KK; Dadarwal A; Kumar R
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e23923. PubMed ID: 35530916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Three New Gingival Retraction Systems: A Comparative Study.
    Kumari S; Singh P; Parmar UG; Patel AM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):922-927. PubMed ID: 34753845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Antimicrobial activity of chemomechanical gingival retraction products.
    Hsu B; Lee S; Schwass D; Tompkins G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Jul; 148(7):493-499. PubMed ID: 28449940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro.
    Liu CM; Huang FM; Yang LC; Chou LS; Chou MY; Chang YC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 15089944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. To cord or not to cord? That is still a question.
    Veitz-Keenan A; Keenan JR
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 28338036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of Gingival Retraction Paste and Subsequent Cleaning with Hydrogen Peroxide on the Polymerization of Three Elastomeric Impression Materials: An In Vitro Study.
    Abduljabbar TS; Al Amri MD; Al Rifaiy MQ; Al-Sowygh ZH; Vohra FA; Balous MA; Alqarni AS; Alotaibi AO
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):709-714. PubMed ID: 28960658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
    Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of gingival displacement, bleeding and ease of application for polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and conventional retraction cord - a clinical trial.
    Nasim H; Lone MA; Kumar B; Ahmed N; Farooqui WA; Alsahhaf A; Alresayes S; Vohra F; Abduljabbar T
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Mar; 27(6):2222-2231. PubMed ID: 37013740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of Gingival Displacement with Aluminum Chloride and Naphazoline Hydrochloride: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    de Carvalho WF; Junior LCV; Junior HFB; Suguiura TPDS; Previdelli ITS; Sábio S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Feb; 29(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 33026719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inflammatory response of canine gingiva to a chemical retraction agent placed at different time intervals.
    Ahmadzadeh A; Majd NE; Chasteen J; Kaviani A; Kavoosi MA
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2014 Jan; 11(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 24688565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Gingival displacement techniques in daily practice. Survey among dental surgeons in Abidjan, Ivory Coast].
    Pesson DM; Bakou OD; Didia EL; Kouame A; Blohoua MR; Djeredou KB
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Dec; 38(152):25-32. PubMed ID: 26939218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.