These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31207442)

  • 21. Six-Year Follow-Up of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.
    Fournier S; Toth GG; De Bruyne B; Johnson NP; Ciccarelli G; Xaplanteris P; Milkas A; Strisciuglio T; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wyffels E; Casselman F; Van Praet F; Stockman B; Degrieck I; Barbato E
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 11(6):e006368. PubMed ID: 29848611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fractional Flow Reserve and Quality-of-Life Improvement After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.
    Nishi T; Piroth Z; De Bruyne B; Jagic N; Möbius-Winkler S; Kobayashi Y; Derimay F; Fournier S; Barbato E; Tonino P; Jüni P; Pijls NHJ; Fearon WF
    Circulation; 2018 Oct; 138(17):1797-1804. PubMed ID: 30354650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. FFR-guided PCI vs CABG surgery in multivessel CAD.
    Lim GB
    Nat Rev Cardiol; 2022 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 34815542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Outcome impact of coronary revascularization strategy reclassification with fractional flow reserve at time of diagnostic angiography: insights from a large French multicenter fractional flow reserve registry.
    Van Belle E; Rioufol G; Pouillot C; Cuisset T; Bougrini K; Teiger E; Champagne S; Belle L; Barreau D; Hanssen M; Besnard C; Dauphin R; Dallongeville J; El Hahi Y; Sideris G; Bretelle C; Lhoest N; Barnay P; Leborgne L; Dupouy P;
    Circulation; 2014 Jan; 129(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 24255062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meta-Analysis Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Fractional-Flow-Reserve- and Angiography-Guided Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Matthews CJ; Naylor K; Blaxill JM; Greenwood JP; Mozid AM; Rossington JA; Veerasamy M; Wheatcroft SB; Bulluck H
    Am J Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 184():160-162. PubMed ID: 36184352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiographically-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
    Thuesen AL; Riber LP; Veien KT; Christiansen EH; Jensen SE; Modrau I; Andreasen JJ; Junker A; Mortensen PE; Jensen LO
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 72(22):2732-2743. PubMed ID: 30497559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Prognostic Value of Residual Coronary Stenoses After Functionally Complete Revascularization.
    Kobayashi Y; Nam CW; Tonino PA; Kimura T; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Fearon WF;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 67(14):1701-11. PubMed ID: 27056776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FAME 3 fails to defame coronary artery bypass grafting: what went wrong in the percutaneous coronary intervention arm?
    Achim A; Leibundgut G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Jun; 62(1):. PubMed ID: 35092270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study.
    Fearon WF; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Siebert U; Pijls NH;
    Am Heart J; 2007 Oct; 154(4):632-6. PubMed ID: 17892983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Study Design of the Graft Patency After FFR-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided CABG Trial (GRAFFITI).
    Toth GG; De Bruyne B; Kala P; Ribichini FL; Casselman F; Ramos R; Piroth Z; Fournier S; Van Mieghem C; Penicka M; Mates M; Van Praet F; Degriek I; Barbato E
    J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2018 Aug; 11(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 30027499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use and Value of Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Arteriography.
    Whayne TF; Sousa MJ; Abdel-Latif A
    Angiology; 2020 Jan; 71(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 31084188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fractional flow reserve to guide and to assess coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Pellicano M; De Bruyne B; Toth GG; Casselman F; Wijns W; Barbato E
    Eur Heart J; 2017 Jul; 38(25):1959-1968. PubMed ID: 28025191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease and abnormal fractional flow reserve.
    Fearon WF; Shilane D; Pijls NH; Boothroyd DB; Tonino PA; Barbato E; Jüni P; De Bruyne B; Hlatky MA;
    Circulation; 2013 Sep; 128(12):1335-40. PubMed ID: 23946263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve- versus angio-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with intermediate stenosis of coronary artery bypass grafts.
    Di Serafino L; De Bruyne B; Mangiacapra F; Bartunek J; Agostoni P; Vanderheyden M; Scognamiglio G; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W; Barbato E
    Am Heart J; 2013 Jul; 166(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23816029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improving outcomes after CABG and PCI.
    Safian RD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Aug; 90(2):194-195. PubMed ID: 28805032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease].
    Piróth Z
    Orv Hetil; 2014 Dec; 155(49):1952-9. PubMed ID: 25434515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical Application of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Artery Disease.
    Parikh V; Agnihotri K; Kadavath S; Patel NJ; Abbott JD
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2016 Apr; 18(4):32. PubMed ID: 26915010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Angiography Versus Hemodynamics to Predict the Natural History of Coronary Stenoses: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation 2 Substudy.
    Ciccarelli G; Barbato E; Toth GG; Gahl B; Xaplanteris P; Fournier S; Milkas A; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Pijls N; Tonino P; Fearon WF; Jüni P; De Bruyne B
    Circulation; 2018 Apr; 137(14):1475-1485. PubMed ID: 29162610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: where to after FAME 2?
    van de Hoef TP; Meuwissen M; Piek JJ
    Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2015; 11():613-22. PubMed ID: 26673639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.