350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31207686)
1. [Comparative analysis of superb microvascular imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of small renal masses].
Zhang D; Xin XJ; Mu J; Mao YR; Zhang S
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 99(23):1778-1781. PubMed ID: 31207686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Application value of superb microvascular imaging for diagnosis of different size renal solid tumors].
Zhang D; Mu J; Mao YR; Wang Y; Xin XJ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 43(11):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 34794227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of image-pro plus assisted superb microvascular imaging for differential diagnosis of renal masses.
Mao Y; Xia T; Wang H; Wei X; Mu J
Urol Oncol; 2024 Sep; 42(9):292.e9-292.e16. PubMed ID: 38760275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prospective Study on the Value of Ultrasound Microflow Assessment to Distinguish Malignant from Benign Solid Breast Masses: Association between Ultrasound Parameters and Histologic Microvessel Densities.
Park AY; Kwon M; Woo OH; Cho KR; Park EK; Cha SH; Song SE; Lee JH; Cha J; Son GS; Seo BK
Korean J Radiol; 2019 May; 20(5):759-772. PubMed ID: 30993927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Multimode Color Doppler Flow Imaging in the Diagnosis of Solid Renal Tumor.
Chen M; Fu X; Shen Y
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2021; 2021():6656877. PubMed ID: 33880110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant renal neoplasms].
Zhang S; Wang XQ; Xin XJ; Xu Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 May; 35(5):382-5. PubMed ID: 24054017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign from malignant solid small renal masses: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
Wei SP; Xu CL; Zhang Q; Zhang QR; Zhao YE; Huang PF; Xie YD; Zhou CS; Tian FL; Yang B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2135-2145. PubMed ID: 28331942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superb microvascular imaging compared with contrast-enhanced ultrasound to assess microvessels in thyroid nodules.
Yongfeng Z; Ping Z; Hong P; Wengang L; Yan Z
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Apr; 47(2):287-297. PubMed ID: 32125575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Renal Complex Cystic Masses: Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Their Assessment and Its Agreement with Computed Tomography.
Sanz E; Hevia V; Gómez V; Álvarez S; Fabuel JJ; Martínez L; Rodriguez-Patrón R; González-Gordaliza C; Burgos FJ
Curr Urol Rep; 2016 Dec; 17(12):89. PubMed ID: 27787749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Superb microvascular imaging is a rational choice for accurate Bosniak classification of renal cystic masses.
Mu J; Mao Y; Li F; Xin X; Zhang S
Br J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 92(1099):20181038. PubMed ID: 31067075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of primary testicular non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions in adults.
Xue N; Zhang S; Wang G
BMC Urol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):210. PubMed ID: 36550425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Intraplaque Neovascularization Using Superb Microvascular Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography.
Oura K; Kato T; Ohba H; Terayama Y
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2348-2353. PubMed ID: 29754774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Differentiating Between Malignant and Benign Solid Breast Masses.
Diao X; Zhan J; Chen L; Chen Y; Cao H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Dec; 20(6):e786-e793. PubMed ID: 32863154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of solid renal lesions.
Li X; Liang P; Guo M; Yu J; Yu X; Cheng Z; Han Z
Discov Med; 2013 Aug; 16(86):15-25. PubMed ID: 23911228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the evaluation of unclear solid renal lesions.
Rübenthaler J; Paprottka K; Marcon J; Hameister E; Hoffmann K; Joiko N; Reiser M; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2016; 64(4):757-763. PubMed ID: 27767985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of renal lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); a 10-year retrospective European single-centre analysis.
Rübenthaler J; Negrão de Figueiredo G; Mueller-Peltzer K; Clevert DA
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4542-4549. PubMed ID: 29744641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT for the detection and characterization of renal masses.
Fang L; Bai K; Chen Y; Zhan J; Zhang Y; Qiu Z; Chen L; Wang L
Biosci Trends; 2021 Mar; 15(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 33642452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for small renal masses.
Oh TH; Lee YH; Seo IY
Korean J Urol; 2014 Sep; 55(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 25237460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Value of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of renal solid renal lesions].
Li X; Liang P; Yu X; Yu J; Cheng Z; Han Z; Liu F; Mu M
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2014 Jun; 34(6):890-5. PubMed ID: 24968851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Papillary renal cell carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Differentiation of distinct histological types with contrast - enhanced ultrasonography.
Xue LY; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Li Z; Li CX; Wen JX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1849-56. PubMed ID: 26149528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
