These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31207776)
21. Comparison of culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), TaqMan Salmonella, and Transia Card Salmonella assays for detection of Salmonella spp. in naturally-contaminated ground chicken, ground turkey, and ground beef. Fratamico PM Mol Cell Probes; 2003 Oct; 17(5):215-21. PubMed ID: 14580395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Selective pre-enrichment method to lessen time needed to recover Salmonella from commercial poultry processing samples. Rasamsetti S; Berrang M; Cox NA; Shariat NW Food Microbiol; 2021 Oct; 99():103818. PubMed ID: 34119103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance of six culture media for isolation of Salmonella species from stool samples. Ruiz J; Núñez ML; Lorente I; Pérez J; Simarro E; Gómez J Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Dec; 15(12):922-6. PubMed ID: 9031874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella on whole broiler carcasses purchased from retail outlets. Simmons M; Fletcher DL; Berrang ME; Cason JA J Food Prot; 2003 Oct; 66(10):1768-70. PubMed ID: 14572211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Isolation of Salmonellae from food samples. V. Determination of the method of choice for enumeration of Salmonella. TAYLOR WI Appl Microbiol; 1961 Nov; 9(6):487-90. PubMed ID: 13920003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Neural Network Model for Thermal Inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium to Elimination in Ground Chicken: Acquisition of Data by Whole Sample Enrichment, Miniature Most-Probable-Number Method. Oscar TP J Food Prot; 2017 Jan; 80(1):104-112. PubMed ID: 28221884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimation of most probable number of Salmonella in retail samples of minced pork. Sinell HJ; Pietzsch O; Klingbeil H; Benner M Int J Food Microbiol; 1990 Oct; 11(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 2261315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Presence of Indicator Organisms and Recovery of Salmonella in Fish and Shellfish. D'Aoust JY; Gelinas R; Maishment C J Food Prot; 1980 Sep; 43(9):679-682. PubMed ID: 30822829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Modified enrichment-serology procedure for detection of salmonellae in soy products. Surdy TE; Haas SO Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Oct; 42(4):704-7. PubMed ID: 7199894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of two methods for isolation of Salmonella from poultry litter samples. Read SC; Irwin RJ; Poppe C; Harris J Poult Sci; 1994 Oct; 73(10):1617-21. PubMed ID: 7816738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An approach for mapping the number and distribution of Salmonella contamination on the poultry carcass. Oscar TP J Food Prot; 2008 Sep; 71(9):1785-90. PubMed ID: 18814381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sampling naturally contaminated broiler carcasses for Salmonella by three different methods. Cox NA; Buhr RJ; Smith DP; Cason JA; Rigsby LL; Bourassa DV; Fedorka-Cray PJ; Cosby DE J Food Prot; 2014 Mar; 77(3):493-5. PubMed ID: 24674443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Salmonella contamination of meat and bone meal. Bensink JC Aust Vet J; 1979 Jan; 55(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 435203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. ICMSF Methods Studies. XIV. Comparative Study on Recovery of Salmonella from Refrigerated Preenrichment and Enrichment Broth Cultures. D'Aoust JY; Beckers HJ; Boothroyd M; Mates A; McKEE CR; Moran AB; Sado P; Spain GE; Sperber WH; Vassiliadis P; Wagner DE; Wiberg C J Food Prot; 1983 May; 46(5):391-399. PubMed ID: 30913656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of sample preparation and preenrichment media on the recovery of Salmonella from cantaloupes, mangoes, and tomatoes. Hammack TS; Johnson ML; Jacobson AP; Andrews WH J AOAC Int; 2006; 89(1):180-4. PubMed ID: 16512245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Abbreviated Preenrichment Period for Recovery of Salmonella spp. from Selected Low-Moisture Dairy Foods. Hammack TS; Satchell FB; Andrews WH; Amaguana RM; June GA; Sherrod PS; Koopman L J Food Prot; 1993 Mar; 56(3):201-204. PubMed ID: 31084083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Comparison of an Enzyme Immunoassay, DNA Hybridization, Antibody Immobilization, and Conventional Methods for Recovery of Naturally Occurring Salmonellae from Processed Broiler Carcasses. Bailey JS; Cox NA; Blankenship LC J Food Prot; 1991 May; 54(5):354-356. PubMed ID: 31051553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Use of+Rambach agar for the detection of Salmonella in feces using broth enrichment. Comparison with our methodology]. Ruiz J; Luz Núñez M; Climent C; Sempere MA; Gómez J Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1995 Apr; 13(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 7779873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of PCR detection of Salmonella in alfalfa sprouts and spent irrigation water collected during sprouting of naturally contaminated seed. Maks N; Fu TJ J Food Prot; 2013 Feb; 76(2):314-7. PubMed ID: 23433380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison between semisolid Rappaport and modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis media for the isolation of Salmonella spp. from foods and feeds. Perales I; Erkiaga E Int J Food Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 14(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 1742172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]