These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31207776)
41. Evaluation of pre-PCR processing approaches for enumeration of Salmonella enterica in naturally contaminated animal feed. Schelin J; Andersson G; Vigre H; Norling B; Häggblom P; Hoorfar J; Rådström P; Löfström C J Appl Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 116(1):167-78. PubMed ID: 23998352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Reduction of Salmonella contamination on the surface of chicken skin using bacteriophage. Atterbury RJ; Gigante AM; Rubio Lozano MS; Méndez Medina RD; Robinson G; Alloush H; Barrow PA; Allen VM Virol J; 2020 Jul; 17(1):98. PubMed ID: 32646515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Determination of salmonellae from municipal wastewaters. Koivunen J; Lanki E; Rajala RL; Siitonen A; Heinonen-Tanski H Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(12):221-4. PubMed ID: 11464761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Performance Assessment of the GENE-TRAK D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM; Greco P; Mozola MA; Colvin RE J Food Prot; 1995 Oct; 58(10):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 31137369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of methods for recovery and enumeration of Campylobacter from freshly processed broilers. Line JE; Stern NJ; Lattuada CP; Benson ST J Food Prot; 2001 Jul; 64(7):982-6. PubMed ID: 11456207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Most-probable-number determination of salmonella levels in naturally contaminated raw almonds using two sample preparation methods. Bansal A; Jones TM; Abd SJ; Danyluk MD; Harris LJ J Food Prot; 2010 Nov; 73(11):1986-92. PubMed ID: 21219709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A comparison of EF-18 agar and modified brilliant green agar with lutensit for isolation of Salmonella from poultry samples. Petersen L Acta Vet Scand; 1997; 38(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 9129349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture. Myint MS; Johnson YJ; Tablante NL; Heckert RA Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 23(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16943057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A comparison of standard cultural methods for the detection of foodborne Salmonella. D'Aoust JY; Sewell AM; Warburton DW Int J Food Microbiol; 1992 May; 16(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 1389993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison of standard cultural methods for the detection of foodborne Salmonella species including three new chromogenic plating media. Schönenbrücher V; Mallinson ET; Bülte M Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 123(1-2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18192050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Surfactants for the Effective Recovery of Salmonella in Fatty Foods. D'Aoust JY; Maishment C; Stotland P; Boville A J Food Prot; 1982 Feb; 45(3):249-252. PubMed ID: 30866284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Detection of salmonellae in chicken feces by a combination of tetrathionate broth enrichment, capillary PCR, and capillary gel electrophoresis. Carli KT; Unal CB; Caner V; Eyigor A J Clin Microbiol; 2001 May; 39(5):1871-6. PubMed ID: 11326006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Isolation of Salmonella from Raw Chicken in Venezuela. Rengel A; Mendoza S J Food Prot; 1984 Mar; 47(3):213-216. PubMed ID: 30921904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of fluorescent-antibody methods and enrichment serology for the detection of Salmonella. Mohr HK; Trenk HL; Yeterian M Appl Microbiol; 1974 Feb; 27(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 4595958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Importance of pre-enrichment media for isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine and poultry. Hoorfar J; Baggesen DL FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1998 Dec; 169(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 9851043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of culture media for selective enrichment and isolation of Salmonella in seafood. Kumar R; Surendran PK; Thampuran N J AOAC Int; 2010; 93(5):1468-71. PubMed ID: 21140659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effect of various media and incubation conditions on recovery of inoculated Salmonella from poultry feed. Cox NA; Bailey JS; Thomson JE Poult Sci; 1982 Jul; 61(7):1314-21. PubMed ID: 7134111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A real-time PCR assay for the detection of Salmonella in a wide variety of food and food-animal matricest. Bohaychuk VM; Gensler GE; McFall ME; King RK; Renter DG J Food Prot; 2007 May; 70(5):1080-7. PubMed ID: 17536664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of the reveal test, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration culture method, and selective media for recovery of Salmonella enteritidis from commercial egg layer flock environments. Zhang L; Yan Z; Ryser ET J Food Prot; 2006 Nov; 69(11):2766-9. PubMed ID: 17133825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Detection of Salmonella spp, Salmonella Enteritidis and Typhimurium in naturally infected broiler chickens by a multiplex PCR-based assay. Paião FG; Arisitides LG; Murate LS; Vilas-Bôas GT; Vilas-Boas LA; Shimokomaki M Braz J Microbiol; 2013; 44(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 24159281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]