156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31208840)
1. The Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V): A Reliability and Validity Study.
Ertan-Schlüter E; Demirhan E; Ünsal EM; Tadıhan-Özkan E
J Voice; 2020 Nov; 34(6):965.e13-965.e22. PubMed ID: 31208840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).
de Almeida SC; Mendes AP; Kempster GB
J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):582.e5-582.e13. PubMed ID: 29936062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Özcebe E; Aydinli FE; Tiğrak TK; İncebay Ö; Yilmaz T
J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):382.e1-382.e10. PubMed ID: 29331405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and Validation of Sentences in Tamil for Psychoacoustic Evaluation of Voice Using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.
Venkatraman Y; Mahalingam S; Boominathan P
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 65(12):4539-4556. PubMed ID: 36368051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Mozzanica F; Ginocchio D; Borghi E; Bachmann C; Schindler A
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 24714558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Zraick RI; Kempster GB; Connor NP; Thibeault S; Klaben BK; Bursac Z; Thrush CR; Glaze LE
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Feb; 20(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 20739631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.
Kondo K; Mizuta M; Kawai Y; Sogami T; Fujimura S; Kojima T; Abe C; Tanaka R; Shiromoto O; Uozumi R; Kishimoto Y; Tateya I; Omori K; Haji T
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):4754-4761. PubMed ID: 34752149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Spanish adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Núñez-Batalla F; Morato-Galán M; García-López I; Ávila-Menéndez A
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2015; 66(5):249-57. PubMed ID: 25443295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cultural and Linguistic Adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Into Hindi.
Joshi A; Baheti I; Angadi V
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3974-3981. PubMed ID: 33226868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Relationship Between Auditory-Perceptual Rating Scales and Objective Voice Measures in Children With Voice Disorders.
Fujiki RB; Thibeault SL
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Jan; 30(1):228-238. PubMed ID: 33439742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Mandarin Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and Its Reliability.
Chen Z; Fang R; Zhang Y; Ge P; Zhuang P; Chou A; Jiang J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Oct; 61(10):2451-2457. PubMed ID: 30242389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and Validity of the Kannada Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.
Gunjawate DR; Ravi R; Bhagavan S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 63(2):385-392. PubMed ID: 32073338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese CAPE-V Instrument-Br CAPE-V for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis.
Behlau M; Rocha B; Englert M; Madazio G
J Voice; 2022 Jul; 36(4):586.e15-586.e20. PubMed ID: 32811691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and Validation of the Bilingual Catalan/Spanish Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.
Calaf N; Garcia-Quintana D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Apr; 67(4):1072-1089. PubMed ID: 38527275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.
Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; Cordeiro GF; Tsuji D; Ogawa AI; Ubrig MT; Menezes MH
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):812.e17-22. PubMed ID: 23026732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual evaluation of severe pediatric voice disorders: rater reliability using the consensus auditory perceptual evaluation of voice.
Kelchner LN; Brehm SB; Weinrich B; Middendorf J; deAlarcon A; Levin L; Elluru R
J Voice; 2010 Jul; 24(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 19135856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relation Between Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) and Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Ataee E; Khoramshahi H; Naderifar E; Dastoorpour M
J Voice; 2022 May; 36(3):435.e1-435.e14. PubMed ID: 32753294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construct and Discriminant Validity of the Persian Version of the Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Dabirmoghaddam P; Khoramshahi H; Dehqan A; Scherer RC; Ansari NN
J Voice; 2022 Nov; 36(6):876.e9-876.e15. PubMed ID: 33036831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language.
Yeşilli-Puzella G; Tadıhan-Özkan E; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2022 Sep; 36(5):736.e25-736.e32. PubMed ID: 32962941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia: A Comparison Between Narrow and Broad Terminology Systems.
Iwarsson J; Bingen-Jakobsen A; Johansen DS; Kølle IE; Pedersen SG; Thorsen SL; Petersen NR
J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):428-436. PubMed ID: 28802788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
