These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31209473)
21. MergeAlign: improving multiple sequence alignment performance by dynamic reconstruction of consensus multiple sequence alignments. Collingridge PW; Kelly S BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 May; 13():117. PubMed ID: 22646090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Phylogenetic Tree Estimation With and Without Alignment: New Distance Methods and Benchmarking. Bogusz M; Whelan S Syst Biol; 2017 Mar; 66(2):218-231. PubMed ID: 27633353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Limited utility of residue masking for positive-selection inference. Spielman SJ; Dawson ET; Wilke CO Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Sep; 31(9):2496-500. PubMed ID: 24899665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Protein multiple sequence alignment benchmarking through secondary structure prediction. Le Q; Sievers F; Higgins DG Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 33(9):1331-1337. PubMed ID: 28093407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Progressive multiple sequence alignment with indel evolution. Maiolo M; Zhang X; Gil M; Anisimova M BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 19(1):331. PubMed ID: 30241460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mind the gaps: evidence of bias in estimates of multiple sequence alignments. Golubchik T; Wise MJ; Easteal S; Jermiin LS Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Nov; 24(11):2433-42. PubMed ID: 17709332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An alignment confidence score capturing robustness to guide tree uncertainty. Penn O; Privman E; Landan G; Graur D; Pupko T Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Aug; 27(8):1759-67. PubMed ID: 20207713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Making automated multiple alignments of very large numbers of protein sequences. Sievers F; Dineen D; Wilm A; Higgins DG Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 29(8):989-95. PubMed ID: 23428640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. ProClust: improved clustering of protein sequences with an extended graph-based approach. Pipenbacher P; Schliep A; Schneckener S; Schönhuth A; Schomburg D; Schrader R Bioinformatics; 2002; 18 Suppl 2():S182-91. PubMed ID: 12386002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. PSAR: measuring multiple sequence alignment reliability by probabilistic sampling. Kim J; Ma J Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Aug; 39(15):6359-68. PubMed ID: 21576232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A hierarchical model for incomplete alignments in phylogenetic inference. Cheng F; Hartmann S; Gupta M; Ibrahim JG; Vision TJ Bioinformatics; 2009 Mar; 25(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 19147663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Parameterizing sequence alignment with an explicit evolutionary model. Rivas E; Eddy SR BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Dec; 16():406. PubMed ID: 26652060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ClipKIT: A multiple sequence alignment trimming software for accurate phylogenomic inference. Steenwyk JL; Buida TJ; Li Y; Shen XX; Rokas A PLoS Biol; 2020 Dec; 18(12):e3001007. PubMed ID: 33264284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of the guide tree on multiple sequence alignments and subsequent phylogenetic analyses. Nelesen S; Liu K; Zhao D; Linder CR; Warnow T Pac Symp Biocomput; 2008; ():25-36. PubMed ID: 18229674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. CMSA: a heterogeneous CPU/GPU computing system for multiple similar RNA/DNA sequence alignment. Chen X; Wang C; Tang S; Yu C; Zou Q BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):315. PubMed ID: 28646874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]