These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31209520)

  • 1. Everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
    Nef HM; Wiebe J; Schmidt G; Möllmann H; Boeder NF; Dörr O; Bauer T; Blachutzik F; Liebetrau C; Elsässer A; Foin N; Hamm CW
    Herz; 2020 Dec; 45(Suppl 1):95-104. PubMed ID: 31209520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Everolimus- Versus Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: A Matched Comparison.
    Wiebe J; Dörr O; Ilstad H; Husser O; Liebetrau C; Boeder N; Bauer T; Möllmann H; Kastrati A; Hamm CW; Nef HM
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(5):477-485. PubMed ID: 28216214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.
    Tamburino C; Capranzano P; Gori T; Latib A; Lesiak M; Nef H; Caramanno G; Naber C; Mehilli J; Di Mario C; Sabaté M; Münzel T; Colombo A; Araszkiewicz A; Wiebe J; Geraci S; Jensen C; Mattesini A; Brugaletta S; Capodanno D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 9(5):440-9. PubMed ID: 26875648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multicenter post-marketing evaluation of the Elixir DESolve
    Nef H; Wiebe J; Boeder N; Dörr O; Bauer T; Hauptmann KE; Latib A; Colombo A; Fischer D; Rudolph T; Foin N; Richardt G; Hamm C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Nov; 92(6):1021-1027. PubMed ID: 29508518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of postdilatation on performance of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared with everolimus-eluting stents: A propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter "real-world" registry.
    Imori Y; D'Ascenzo F; Gori T; Münzel T; Fabrizio U; Campo G; Cerrato E; Napp LC; Iannaccone M; Ghadri JR; Kazemian E; Binder RK; Jaguszewski M; Csordas A; Capasso P; Biscaglia S; Conrotto F; Varbella F; Garbo R; Gaita F; Erne P; Lüscher TF; Moretti C; Frangieh AH; Templin C
    Cardiol J; 2016; 23(4):374-83. PubMed ID: 27515481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).
    Brugaletta S; Gori T; Low AF; Tousek P; Pinar E; Gomez-Lara J; Scalone G; Schulz E; Chan MY; Kocka V; Hurtado J; Gomez-Hospital JA; Münzel T; Lee CH; Cequier A; Valdés M; Widimsky P; Serruys PW; Sabaté M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt B):189-197. PubMed ID: 25616924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation for the treatment of bifurcation lesions - Implications from early clinical experience during daily practice.
    Wiebe J; Dörr O; Bauer T; Liebetrau C; Boeder N; Möllmann H; Hamm CW; Nef HM
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 27085220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: the midterm follow-up of the prospective ABSORB DM Benelux study.
    Hommels TM; Hermanides RS; Rasoul S; Berta B; IJsselmuiden AJJ; Jessurun GAJ; Benit E; Pereira B; De Luca G; Kedhi E
    Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2019 Mar; 18(1):25. PubMed ID: 30851731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Serial Multimodality Imaging and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Novel DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System for the Treatment of Single De Novo Coronary Lesions.
    Abizaid A; Costa RA; Schofer J; Ormiston J; Maeng M; Witzenbichler B; Botelho RV; Costa JR; Chamié D; Abizaid AS; Castro JP; Morrison L; Toyloy S; Bhat V; Yan J; Verheye S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 9(6):565-74. PubMed ID: 27013155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk and timing of clinical events according to diabetic status of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stent: 2-year results from a propensity score matched comparison of ABSORB EXTEND and SPIRIT trials.
    Campos CM; Caixeta A; Franken M; Bartorelli AL; Whitbourn RJ; Wu CJ; Li Paul Kao H; Rosli MA; Carrie D; De Bruyne B; Stone GW; Serruys PW; Abizaid A;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):387-395. PubMed ID: 28471086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated With the Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: The BVS Expand Registry.
    Felix CM; Fam JM; Diletti R; Ishibashi Y; Karanasos A; Everaert BR; van Mieghem NM; Daemen J; de Jaegere PP; Zijlstra F; Regar ES; Onuma Y; van Geuns RJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(16):1652-63. PubMed ID: 27476094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of strut thickness on acute mechanical performance: A comparison study using optical coherence tomography between DESolve 150 and DESolve 100.
    Boeder NF; Dörr O; Bauer T; Mattesini A; Elsässer A; Liebetrau C; Achenbach S; Hamm CW; Nef HM
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 246():74-79. PubMed ID: 28579164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Two-year results from the German-Austrian ABSORB registry.
    Tröbs M; Achenbach S; Nef HM; Gori T; Naber C; Neumann T; Richardt G; Schmermund A; Wöhrle J; Zahn R; Hamm CW;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Oct; 98(4):E564-E570. PubMed ID: 34137482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Post-Dilatation Following Primary PCI With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: An Angiographic and Optical Coherence Tomography TROFI II Substudy.
    Yamaji K; Brugaletta S; Sabaté M; Iñiguez A; Jensen LO; Cequier A; Hofma SH; Christiansen EH; Suttorp M; van Es GA; Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Windecker S; Räber L
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 10(18):1867-1877. PubMed ID: 28935079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of Strut Width in Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity-Matched Comparison Between Bioresorbable Scaffolds and the First-Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent.
    Kawamoto H; Panoulas VF; Sato K; Miyazaki T; Naganuma T; Sticchi A; Figini F; Latib A; Chieffo A; Carlino M; Montorfano M; Colombo A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 8(7):900-9. PubMed ID: 26003020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.
    Roguin A; Kandzari DE; Marcusohn E; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(10):e007331. PubMed ID: 30354631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Randomized Trial Comparing the NeoVas Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Han Y; Xu B; Fu G; Wang X; Xu K; Jin C; Tao L; Li L; Hou Y; Su X; Fang Q; Chen L; Liu H; Wang B; Yuan Z; Gao C; Zhou S; Sun Z; Zhao Y; Guan C; Stone GW;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 11(3):260-272. PubMed ID: 29413240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcome After Long-segment Stenting With Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Focusing on the Concept of Overlapping Implantation.
    Wiebe J; Dörr O; Liebetrau C; Bauer T; Wilkens E; Ilstad H; Boeder N; Elsässer A; Möllmann H; Hamm CW; Nef HM
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2016 Dec; 69(12):1144-1151. PubMed ID: 28134094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.
    Verheye S; Ormiston JA; Stewart J; Webster M; Sanidas E; Costa R; Costa JR; Chamie D; Abizaid AS; Pinto I; Morrison L; Toyloy S; Bhat V; Yan J; Abizaid A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 24139932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Pt-Cr everolimus-eluting stent with bioabsorbable polymer in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Results from the SYNERGY ACS registry.
    de la Torre Hernandez JM; Moreno R; Gonzalo N; Rivera R; Linares JA; Veiga Fernandez G; Gomez Menchero A; Garcia Del Blanco B; Hernandez F; Benito Gonzalez T; Subinas A; Escaned J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Aug; 20(8):705-710. PubMed ID: 30414798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.