These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31209563)

  • 41. Trends in robotic surgery utilization across tertiary children's hospitals in the United States.
    Richards HW; Kulaylat AN; Cooper JN; McLeod DJ; Diefenbach KA; Michalsky MP
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Nov; 35(11):6066-6072. PubMed ID: 33112985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Validation of the RobotiX Mentor Robotic Surgery Simulator.
    Whittaker G; Aydin A; Raison N; Kum F; Challacombe B; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
    J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 26576836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Robotic surgery in infants and children: an argument for smaller and fewer incisions.
    Kawal T; Sahadev R; Srinivasan A; Chu D; Weiss D; Long C; Van Batavia J; Bodar Y; Shah J; Shukla AR
    World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1835-1840. PubMed ID: 31016450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Design and Validation of a Low-Cost, High-Fidelity Model for Urethrovesical Anastomosis in Radical Prostatectomy.
    Johnson BA; Timberlake M; Steinberg RL; Kosemund M; Mueller B; Gahan JC
    J Endourol; 2019 Apr; 33(4):331-336. PubMed ID: 30734578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.
    Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparative cost analysis of robotic-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery and open surgery: the necessity of investing knowledgeably.
    Tedesco G; Faggiano FC; Leo E; Derrico P; Ritrovato M
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):5044-5051. PubMed ID: 26983435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Urology residents experience comparable workload profiles when performing live porcine nephrectomies and robotic surgery virtual reality training modules.
    Mouraviev V; Klein M; Schommer E; Thiel DD; Samavedi S; Kumar A; Leveillee RJ; Thomas R; Pow-Sang JM; Su LM; Mui E; Smith R; Patel V
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Mar; 10(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 26753619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery.
    Aydin A; Raison N; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
    Nat Rev Urol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):503-19. PubMed ID: 27549358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. EAU guidelines on robotic and single-site surgery in urology.
    Merseburger AS; Herrmann TR; Shariat SF; Kyriazis I; Nagele U; Traxer O; Liatsikos EN;
    Eur Urol; 2013 Aug; 64(2):277-91. PubMed ID: 23764016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation and comparison of basic gestures in ex vivo laparoscopic surgery using a robotic instrument and traditional laparoscopic instruments.
    Madec FX; Dariane C; Cornu JN
    Prog Urol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 31889630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.
    Bric JD; Lumbard DC; Frelich MJ; Gould JC
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2169-78. PubMed ID: 26304107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Can remote assistance for robotic surgery improve surgical performance in simulation training? A prospective clinical trial of urology residents using a simulator in south america.
    Carneiro A; Claros OR; Cha JD; Kayano PP; Apezzato M; Wagner AA; Lemos GC
    Int Braz J Urol; 2022; 48(6):952-960. PubMed ID: 36173407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Role of Robotics in Children: A brave New World!
    Spinoit AF; Nguyen H; Subramaniam R
    Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Apr; 3(2-3):172-180. PubMed ID: 28889938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Single-port robotic surgery: the next generation of minimally invasive urology.
    Dobbs RW; Halgrimson WR; Talamini S; Vigneswaran HT; Wilson JO; Crivellaro S
    World J Urol; 2020 Apr; 38(4):897-905. PubMed ID: 31463560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Minimally Invasive Colectomy.
    Simianu VV; Gaertner WB; Kuntz K; Kwaan MR; Lowry AC; Madoff RD; Jensen CC
    Ann Surg; 2020 Aug; 272(2):334-341. PubMed ID: 32675547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Robotics in neurosurgery: A literature review.
    Ahmed SI; Javed G; Mubeen B; Bareeqa SB; Rasheed H; Rehman A; Phulpoto MM; Samar SS; Aziz K
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2018 Feb; 68(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 29479103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Simulation-based training for prostate surgery.
    Khan R; Aydin A; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116(4):665-74. PubMed ID: 24588806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Current trends in pediatric minimally invasive urologic surgery.
    Lee DJ; Kim PH; Koh CJ
    Korean J Urol; 2010 Feb; 51(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 20414418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Current Concepts in Pediatric Robotic Assisted Pyeloplasty.
    Morales-López RA; Pérez-Marchán M; Pérez Brayfield M
    Front Pediatr; 2019; 7():4. PubMed ID: 30733937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Robot Docking Time: Cumulative Summation Analysis of a Procedure-Independent Learning Curve in Pediatric Urology.
    Ashraf J; Krishnan J; Turner A; Subramaniam R
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Sep; 28(9):1139-1141. PubMed ID: 29897840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.