155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31209924)
1. Reserve design to optimize functional connectivity and animal density.
Gupta A; Dilkina B; Morin DJ; Fuller AK; Royle JA; Sutherland C; Gomes CP
Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1023-1034. PubMed ID: 31209924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal design of compact and connected nature reserves for multiple species.
Wang Y; Önal H
Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):413-24. PubMed ID: 26365329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing spatial conservation prioritization methods with site- versus spatial dependency-based connectivity.
Muenzel D; Critchell K; Cox C; Campbell SJ; Jakub R; Chollett I; Krueck N; Holstein D; Treml EA; Beger M
Conserv Biol; 2023 Apr; 37(2):e14008. PubMed ID: 36178033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of planning for connectivity on linear reserve networks.
Lentini PE; Gibbons P; Carwardine J; Fischer J; Drielsma M; Martin TG
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):796-807. PubMed ID: 23647073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accounting for enforcement costs in the spatial allocation of marine zones.
Davis K; Kragt M; Gelcich S; Schilizzi S; Pannell D
Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):226-37. PubMed ID: 25103090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trade-offs and efficiencies in optimal budget-constrained multispecies corridor networks.
Dilkina B; Houtman R; Gomes CP; Montgomery CA; McKelvey KS; Kendall K; Graves TA; Bernstein R; Schwartz MK
Conserv Biol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 27677418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating population density and connectivity of American mink using spatial capture-recapture.
Fuller AK; Sutherland CS; Royle JA; Hare MP
Ecol Appl; 2016 Jun; 26(4):1125-35. PubMed ID: 27509753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating larval connectivity into the marine conservation decision-making process across spatial scales.
Muenzel D; Critchell K; Cox C; Campbell SJ; Jakub R; Suherfian W; Sara L; Chollett I; Treml EA; Beger M
Conserv Biol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):e14038. PubMed ID: 36478610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effectiveness of marine reserve systems constructed using different surrogates of biodiversity.
Sutcliffe PR; Klein CJ; Pitcher CR; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 25922982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of seascape connectivity on reserve performance along exposed coastlines.
Ortodossi NL; Gilby BL; Schlacher TA; Connolly RM; Yabsley NA; Henderson CJ; Olds AD
Conserv Biol; 2019 Jun; 33(3):580-589. PubMed ID: 30318640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Designing connected marine reserves in the face of global warming.
Álvarez-Romero JG; Munguía-Vega A; Beger M; Del Mar Mancha-Cisneros M; Suárez-Castillo AN; Gurney GG; Pressey RL; Gerber LR; Morzaria-Luna HN; Reyes-Bonilla H; Adams VM; Kolb M; Graham EM; VanDerWal J; Castillo-López A; Hinojosa-Arango G; Petatán-Ramírez D; Moreno-Baez M; Godínez-Reyes CR; Torre J
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):e671-e691. PubMed ID: 29274104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [On the methods of ecological security design for nature reserves].
Xu H; Bao H
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2004 Jul; 15(7):1266-70. PubMed ID: 15506112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of reserves and anthropogenic habitats for functional connectivity and resilience of ephemeral wetlands.
Uden DR; Hellman ML; Angeler DG; Allen CR
Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(7):1569-82. PubMed ID: 29210223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reserve design to optimize the long-term persistence of multiple species.
Strimas-Mackey M; Brodie JF
Ecol Appl; 2018 Jul; 28(5):1354-1361. PubMed ID: 29723932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Representation of critical natural capital in China.
Lü Y; Zhang L; Zeng Y; Fu B; Whitham C; Liu S; Wu B
Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 28218967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using individual-based movement information to identify spatial conservation priorities for mobile species.
Dwyer RG; Campbell HA; Pillans RD; Watts ME; Lyon BJ; Guru SM; Dinh MN; Possingham HP; Franklin CE
Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1426-1437. PubMed ID: 30963642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models.
Carroll SL; Schmidt GM; Waller JS; Graves TA
Mov Ecol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):8. PubMed ID: 38263096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating surrogate species and seascape connectivity to improve marine conservation outcomes.
Olds AD; Connolly RM; Pitt KA; Maxwell PS; Aswani S; Albert S
Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):982-91. PubMed ID: 24527964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
