These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3121032)
1. Consent to treatment and criminal responsibility in the mentally ill. Dyer C Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Nov; 295(6610):1402-3. PubMed ID: 3121032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Synthetic competence and consent. Ought a defendant be drugged to stand trial? Graber GC; Marsh FH Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 34567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Law and the mentally ill. Tanay E Wayne Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 22(3):781-813. PubMed ID: 11664634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Imprisoning the mentally ill: does it matter? Pawel MA Crim Justice Ethics; 2001; 20(1):2, 66. PubMed ID: 11831288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus. Cobun LS Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. INSANITY AND CRIMINAL OFFENDERS. SOME COMMENTS ON THE REPORT OF GOVERNOR'S SPECIAL COMMISSIONS ON INSANITY AND CRIMINAL OFFENDERS. MCGAUGHEY WM Calif Med; 1963 Nov; 99(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 14081776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Participation by psychologists in insanity defense proceedings: an advocacy. Delman RP J Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 11658288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity": Some therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases. Perlin ML Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(5-6):475-81. PubMed ID: 20947166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Criminality, confinement, psychiatric care and consent: a dilemma augmenting combination. Somerville MA Leg Med Q; 1981-1983; 5-7():147-59. PubMed ID: 10287957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The new biotechnology and the role of legal intervention. Burton SJ Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1974 Oct; 44(5):688-96. PubMed ID: 4432918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right to refuse treatment in Quebec. Morrison D Health Law Can; 1985; 5():65-8. PubMed ID: 11660312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law. Gutheil TG; Mills MJ Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. More positive supreme court views on psychiatry. Kennelly DJ Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 142(3):387-8. PubMed ID: 3970284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Supreme Court and the mentally disabled criminal defendant: recent developments. Perlin ML Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(4):391-409. PubMed ID: 3427241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A new look at the insanity defense in Texas. Dudley HK; Miller GE; Reinehr RC; Mascot PJ Tex Med; 1984 Jun; 80(6):62-7. PubMed ID: 6740521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mental illness and the Lebanese criminal justice system: Practices and challenges. Ghossoub E; Felthous AR Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 71():101604. PubMed ID: 32768111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of empathy in forensic examinations. Shuman DW Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(3 and 4):289-302. PubMed ID: 11659813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Opinions concerning the insanity plea and criminality among mental patients. Pasewark RA; Seidenzahl D Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 540170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In re Orr. Illinois. Appellate Court, Fourth District North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Nov; 531():64-75. PubMed ID: 12041254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]