These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31210365)

  • 1. Site-selection bias and apparent population declines in long-term studies.
    Fournier AMV; White ER; Heard SB
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1370-1379. PubMed ID: 31210365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of site-selection bias on estimates of biodiversity change.
    Mentges A; Blowes SA; Hodapp D; Hillebrand H; Chase JM
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):688-698. PubMed ID: 32808693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The power to detect regional declines in common bird populations using continental monitoring data.
    Baker DJ; Clarke RH; McGeoch MA
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Jul; 29(5):e01918. PubMed ID: 31162764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survey design for broad-scale, territory-based occupancy monitoring of a raptor: Ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis) as a case study.
    Johnson TN; Nasman K; Wallace ZP; Olson LE; Squires JR; Nielson RM; Kennedy PL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213654. PubMed ID: 30901333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of an invasive plant on population dynamics in toads.
    Greenberg DA; Green DM
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 23692126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of recent environmental change on accuracy of inferences of extinction status.
    Clements CF; Collen B; Blackburn TM; Petchey OL
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):971-81. PubMed ID: 24962314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid declines of large mammal populations after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
    Bragina EV; Ives AR; Pidgeon AM; Kuemmerle T; Baskin LM; Gubar YP; Piquer-Rodríguez M; Keuler NS; Petrosyan VG; Radeloff VC
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):844-53. PubMed ID: 25581070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting population declines over large areas with presence-absence, time-to-encounter, and count survey methods.
    Pollock JE
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Jun; 20(3):882-92. PubMed ID: 16909580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting population declines via monitoring the effective number of breeders (N
    Luikart G; Antao T; Hand BK; Muhlfeld CC; Boyer MC; Cosart T; Trethewey B; Al-Chockhachy R; Waples RS
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Feb; 21(2):379-393. PubMed ID: 32881365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferring the nature of anthropogenic threats from long-term abundance records.
    Shoemaker KT; Akçakaya HR
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):238-49. PubMed ID: 25065712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying population declines based on presence-only records for red-list assessments.
    Cruickshank SS; Ozgul A; Zumbach S; Schmidt BR
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1112-21. PubMed ID: 26864587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global sea turtle conservation successes.
    Mazaris AD; Schofield G; Gkazinou C; Almpanidou V; Hays GC
    Sci Adv; 2017 Sep; 3(9):e1600730. PubMed ID: 28948215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variability in population abundance and the classification of extinction risk.
    Wilson HB; Kendall BE; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):747-57. PubMed ID: 21480994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal analysis of genetic structure to assess population dynamics of reintroduced swift foxes.
    Cullingham CI; Moehrenschlager A
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1389-98. PubMed ID: 24033503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term declines of European insectivorous bird populations and potential causes.
    Bowler DE; Heldbjerg H; Fox AD; de Jong M; Böhning-Gaese K
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1120-1130. PubMed ID: 30912605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can estimates of genetic effective population size contribute to fisheries stock assessments?
    Ovenden JR; Leigh GM; Blower DC; Jones AT; Moore A; Bustamante C; Buckworth RC; Bennett MB; Dudgeon CL
    J Fish Biol; 2016 Dec; 89(6):2505-2518. PubMed ID: 27730623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Roles of patch characteristics, drought frequency, and restoration in long-term trends of a widespread amphibian.
    Hossack BR; Adams MJ; Pearl CA; Wilson KW; Bull EL; Lohr K; Patla D; Pilliod DS; Jones JM; Wheeler KK; McKay SP; Corn PS
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1410-20. PubMed ID: 24033460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving risk assessments in conservation ecology.
    Ono K; Langangen Ø; Stenseth NC
    Nat Commun; 2019 Jun; 10(1):2836. PubMed ID: 31249288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who escapes detection? Quantifying the causes and consequences of sampling biases in a long-term field study.
    Kidd LR; Sheldon BC; Simmonds EG; Cole EF
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Nov; 84(6):1520-9. PubMed ID: 26081262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of contemporary effective population size and population declines using RAD sequence data.
    Nunziata SO; Weisrock DW
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Mar; 120(3):196-207. PubMed ID: 29269932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.