BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31210611)

  • 21. Breast density prediction from low and standard dose mammograms using deep learning: effect of image resolution and model training approach on prediction quality.
    Squires S; Harkness EF; Mackenzie A; Evans DG; Howell SJ; Astley SM
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38701765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Labeling for 2D Mammography and Comparison of Complexity for Machine Learning Tasks.
    Yi PH; Lin A; Wei J; Yu AC; Sair HI; Hui FK; Hager GD; Harvey SC
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31197559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
    Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway.
    Larsen M; Olstad CF; Lee CI; Hovda T; Hoff SR; Martiniussen MA; Mikalsen KØ; Lund-Hanssen H; Solli HS; Silberhorn M; Sulheim ÅØ; Auensen S; Nygård JF; Hofvind S
    Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230375. PubMed ID: 38597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Discriminating solitary cysts from soft tissue lesions in mammography using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network.
    Kooi T; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N; den Heeten A
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 28094850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions.
    Kooi T; Litjens G; van Ginneken B; Gubern-Mérida A; Sánchez CI; Mann R; den Heeten A; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2017 Jan; 35():303-312. PubMed ID: 27497072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Machine Learning for Workflow Applications in Screening Mammography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hickman SE; Woitek R; Le EPV; Im YR; Mouritsen Luxhøj C; Aviles-Rivero AI; Baxter GC; MacKay JW; Gilbert FJ
    Radiology; 2022 Jan; 302(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 34665034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new near-term breast cancer risk prediction scheme based on the quantitative analysis of ipsilateral view mammograms.
    Sun W; Tseng TB; Qian W; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Yu H; Zhou S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 155():29-38. PubMed ID: 29512502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set.
    Drukker K; Giger ML; Joe BN; Kerlikowske K; Greenwood H; Drukteinis JS; Niell B; Fan B; Malkov S; Avila J; Kazemi L; Shepherd J
    Radiology; 2019 Mar; 290(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 30526359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
    Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. AsymMirai: Interpretable Mammography-based Deep Learning Model for 1-5-year Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Donnelly J; Moffett L; Barnett AJ; Trivedi H; Schwartz F; Lo J; Rudin C
    Radiology; 2024 Mar; 310(3):e232780. PubMed ID: 38501952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
    Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
    Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Sung JS; Lebron L; Keating D; D'Alessio D; Comstock CE; Lee CH; Pike MC; Ayhan M; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31453765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
    Fenton JJ; Taplin SH; Carney PA; Abraham L; Sickles EA; D'Orsi C; Berns EA; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(14):1399-409. PubMed ID: 17409321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multitask deep learning on mammography to predict extensive intraductal component in invasive breast cancer.
    Tsai HY; Kao YW; Wang JC; Tsai TY; Chung WS; Hsu JS; Hou MF; Weng SF
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr; 34(4):2593-2604. PubMed ID: 37812297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Applying Data-driven Imaging Biomarker in Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: Preliminary Study.
    Kim EK; Kim HE; Han K; Kang BJ; Sohn YM; Woo OH; Lee CW
    Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):2762. PubMed ID: 29426948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Mayo RC; Leung JWT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):445-451. PubMed ID: 29792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Sprague BL; Arao RF; Miglioretti DL; Henderson LM; Buist DS; Onega T; Rauscher GH; Lee JM; Tosteson AN; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD;
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 28244803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
    Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.