190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31210612)
1. Performance and Reading Time of Automated Breast US with or without Computer-aided Detection.
Yang S; Gao X; Liu L; Shu R; Yan J; Zhang G; Xiao Y; Ju Y; Zhao N; Song H
Radiology; 2019 Sep; 292(3):540-549. PubMed ID: 31210612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 1000-Case Reader Study of Radiologists' Performance in Interpretation of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images with a Computer-Aided Detection System.
Xu X; Bao L; Tan Y; Zhu L; Kong F; Wang W
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1694-1702. PubMed ID: 29853222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.
van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance and reading time of lung nodule identification on multidetector CT with or without an artificial intelligence-powered computer-aided detection system.
Hsu HH; Ko KH; Chou YC; Wu YC; Chiu SH; Chang CK; Chang WC
Clin Radiol; 2021 Aug; 76(8):626.e23-626.e32. PubMed ID: 34023068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing Diagnostic Performance Using the Transverse Plane Plus Coronal Plane Compared With the Transverse Plane Alone in Screening Automated Breast Ultrasound.
Wang Y; Yue J; Xing Y; Ju Y; Gao X; Shu R; Wang Z; Liu B; Xiao Y; Zhang G; Li H; Wang T; Guan X; Song Z; Song H
J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Jun; 43(6):1013-1024. PubMed ID: 38323467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the effect of computer-aided classification of benign and malignant lesions on reader performance in automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound.
Tan T; Platel B; Twellmann T; van Schie G; Mus R; Grivegnée A; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1381-8. PubMed ID: 24119350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Quadri-Planes Method in Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Lesions by Ultrasonography: Prospective Single-Center Study.
Yongping L; Juan Z; Zhou P; Yongfeng Z; Liu W; Shi Y
JMIR Med Inform; 2020 May; 8(5):e18251. PubMed ID: 32369039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decrease in interpretation time for both novice and experienced readers using a concurrent computer-aided detection system for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chae EY; Kim HH; Jeong JW; Chae SH; Lee S; Choi YW
Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2518-2525. PubMed ID: 30547203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpretation Time Using a Concurrent-Read Computer-Aided Detection System for Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breast Tissue.
Jiang Y; Inciardi MF; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):452-461. PubMed ID: 29792747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Ultrasonography for Detection of Breast Lesions Less and More Than 2 cm: Prospective Comparative Study.
Yongping L; Zhou P; Juan Z; Yongfeng Z; Liu W; Shi Y
JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Mar; 8(3):e16334. PubMed ID: 32130149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving digital breast tomosynthesis reading time: A pilot multi-reader, multi-case study using concurrent Computer-Aided Detection (CAD).
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Levy L; Toubiana PR; Cohen-Scali F; Toledano AY; Boyer B
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 97():83-89. PubMed ID: 29153373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.
Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved cancer detection in automated breast ultrasound by radiologists using Computer Aided Detection.
van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Platel B; de Jong M; Steenbakkers A; Mourits M; Grivegnee A; Borelli C; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():54-59. PubMed ID: 28267549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided detection of lung nodules on multidetector CT in concurrent-reader and second-reader modes: a comparative study.
Matsumoto S; Ohno Y; Aoki T; Yamagata H; Nogami M; Matsumoto K; Yamashita Y; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1332-7. PubMed ID: 23480965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and interpretation time of computer-aided detection among novice and experienced breast MRI readers.
Lehman CD; Blume JD; DeMartini WB; Hylton NM; Herman B; Schnall MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W683-9. PubMed ID: 23701102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the effect of computer aided diagnosis system on breast ultrasound for inexperienced radiologists in describing and determining breast lesions.
Lee J; Kim S; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Park GE
Med Ultrason; 2019 Aug; 21(3):239-245. PubMed ID: 31476202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
