These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31210886)

  • 1. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in measuring thicknesses of hard-tissue-mimicking material adjacent to different implant thread surfaces.
    Yen CY; Kuo PJ; Lin CY; Nie-Shiuh Chang N; Hsiao HY; Chin YT; Tsai CC; Lee SY
    J Dent Sci; 2019 Jun; 14(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 31210886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
    Razavi T; Palmer RM; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer PJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):718-25. PubMed ID: 20636726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy evaluation of cone beam computed tomography applied to measure peri-implant bone thickness in living patients: an ex vivo and in vivo experiment.
    Lan Y; Huang X; Fan M; Yu H; Xie Z; Zhou Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6347-6359. PubMed ID: 35802190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography.
    Wang D; Künzel A; Golubovic V; Mihatovic I; John G; Chen Z; Becker J; Schwarz F
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jul; 17(6):1601-9. PubMed ID: 23064974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the cone-beam computed tomography accuracy in measuring soft tissue thickness in different areas of the jaws.
    Moudi E; Haghanifar S; Johari M; Gholinia H; Ghanbarabadi MK
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2019; 23(4):334-338. PubMed ID: 31367130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective assessment of dental implant-related perforations of relevant anatomical structures and inadequate spacing between implants/teeth using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos N; Mancini AXM; Oliveira ML; Oliveira-Santos C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Sep; 24(9):3281-3288. PubMed ID: 31960132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Results of Measurement of Dimensions of the Placed Dental Implants on Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Dimensions of the Producers of the Implants.
    Repesa M; Sofic A; Jakupovic S; Tosum S; Kazazic L; Dervisevic A
    Acta Inform Med; 2017 Jun; 25(2):116-120. PubMed ID: 28883677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro comparison of the effect of different slice thicknesses on the accuracy of linear measurements on cone beam computed tomography images in implant sites.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 25569395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography is limited at implant sites with a thin buccal bone: A laboratory study.
    Domic D; Bertl K; Ahmad S; Schropp L; Hellén-Halme K; Stavropoulos A
    J Periodontol; 2021 Apr; 92(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 32846005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Evaluating Bone Density and Cortical Bone Thickness at the Implant Site: Micro-Computed Tomography and Histologic Analysis.
    Suttapreyasri S; Suapear P; Leepong N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 29(8):2026-2031. PubMed ID: 29894463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Implant-Induced Artifacts on Interpreting Adjacent Bone Structures on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Sheridan RA; Chiang YC; Decker AM; Sutthiboonyapan P; Chan HL; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 29095787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study.
    Vanderstuyft T; Tarce M; Sanaan B; Jacobs R; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Nov; 46(11):1134-1143. PubMed ID: 31446644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positioning errors of dental implants and their associations with adjacent structures and anatomical variations: A CBCT-based study.
    Ribas BR; Nascimento EHL; Freitas DQ; Pontual ADA; Pontual MLDA; Perez DEC; Ramos-Perez FMM
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2020 Dec; 50(4):281-290. PubMed ID: 33409136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of soft tissue grafting, orofacial implant position, and angulation on facial hard and soft tissue thickness at immediately inserted and provisionalized implants in the anterior maxilla.
    Noelken R; Geier J; Kunkel M; Jepsen S; Wagner W
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 20(5):674-682. PubMed ID: 30092115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of peri-implant defects at titanium and zirconium dioxide implants by means of periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography: An in-vitro examination.
    Steiger-Ronay V; Krcmaric Z; Schmidlin PR; Sahrmann P; Wiedemeier DB; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 30387207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
    Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.