165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31213258)
1. [Prostate pathology recommendations from the Uropathology working group of the Spanish Society of Pathology].
Sanz Ortega J; Gallel P; Hierro Martín MI; de Torres I
Rev Esp Patol; 2019; 52(3):167-177. PubMed ID: 31213258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The reasons behind variation in Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies: areas of agreement and misconception among 266 European pathologists.
Berney DM; Algaba F; Camparo P; Compérat E; Griffiths D; Kristiansen G; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Varma M; Egevad L
Histopathology; 2014 Feb; 64(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 24102975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Essential Updates in Grading, Morphotyping, Reporting, and Staging of Prostate Carcinoma for General Surgical Pathologists.
Paner GP; Gandhi J; Choy B; Amin MB
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2019 May; 143(5):550-564. PubMed ID: 30865487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gleason grading: past, present and future.
Delahunt B; Miller RJ; Srigley JR; Evans AJ; Samaratunga H
Histopathology; 2012 Jan; 60(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22212079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative influence of cribriform growth and percent Gleason 4 in prostatic biopsies with Gleason 3+4 cancer.
Czaja RC; Tarima S; Wu R; Palagnmonthip W; Iczkowski KA
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Jun; 52():151725. PubMed ID: 33610958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Mansouri N; Msakni I; Gargouri F; Khiari R; Bouziani A; Laabidi B
Tunis Med; 2018 Jul; 96(7):430-436. PubMed ID: 30430487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of the 2014 Gleason grade grouping in a Canadian cohort of patients with localized prostate cancer.
Wissing M; Brimo F; Chevalier S; Scarlata E; McKercher G; O'Flaherty A; Aprikian S; Thibodeau V; Saad F; Carmel M; Lacombe L; Têtu B; Ekindi-Ndongo N; Latour M; Trudel D; Aprikian A
BJU Int; 2019 Apr; 123(4):624-631. PubMed ID: 30113732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens.
Treurniet KM; Trudel D; Sykes J; Evans AJ; Finelli A; Van der Kwast TH
J Clin Pathol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 24403214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System.
Kryvenko ON; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Oct; 140(10):1140-52. PubMed ID: 26756649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of modern Gleason 9/10 prostate adenocarcinoma: a single tertiary centre experience within the Republic of Ireland.
O'Kelly F; Elamin S; Cahill A; Aherne P; White J; Buckley J; O'Regan KN; Brady A; Power DG; O'Brien MF; Sweeney P; Mayer N; Kelly PJ
World J Urol; 2014 Aug; 32(4):1067-74. PubMed ID: 24129893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biopsy undergrading in men with Gleason score 6 and fatal prostate cancer in the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Rotterdam.
Alberts AR; Bokhorst LP; Kweldam CF; Schoots IG; van der Kwast TH; van Leenders GJ; Roobol MJ
Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 28173626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
