286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31213338)
1. Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes of Custom Triflange Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
De Martino I; Strigelli V; Cacciola G; Gu A; Bostrom MP; Sculco PK
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2511-2518. PubMed ID: 31213338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes of Constrained Acetabular Liners in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
Mancino F; Jones CW; Sculco TP; Sculco PK; Maccauro G; De Martino I
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Aug; 36(8):3028-3041. PubMed ID: 34030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Midterm Survivorship After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component.
Gladnick BP; Fehring KA; Odum SM; Christie MJ; DeBoer DK; Fehring TK
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):500-504. PubMed ID: 29033157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survivorship and clinical outcomes of proximal femoral replacement in non-neoplastic primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Mocini F; Cacciola G; Malerba G; Perisano C; De Martino I
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(Suppl 2):933. PubMed ID: 34749680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of Acetabular Reconstructions for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Discontinuity: A Systematic Review.
Malahias MA; Ma QL; Gu A; Ward SE; Alexiades MM; Sculco PK
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1145-1153.e2. PubMed ID: 31784362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Custom Triflange Cups: 20-Year Experience.
Sershon RA; McDonald JF; Nagda S; Hamilton WG; Engh CA
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep; 36(9):3264-3268. PubMed ID: 34074542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual biomechanical assessment of porous tantalum and custom triflange components in the treatment of patients with acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity.
Callary SA; Broekhuis D; Barends J; Ramasamy B; Nelissen RGHH; Solomon LB; Kaptein BL
Bone Joint J; 2024 May; 106-B(5 Supple B):74-81. PubMed ID: 38688495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Good results at 2-year follow-up of a custom-made triflange acetabular component for large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity: a prospective case series of 50 hips.
Scharff-Baauw M; Van Hooff ML; Van Hellemondt GG; Jutte PC; Bulstra SK; Spruit M
Acta Orthop; 2021 Jun; 92(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 33583339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option.
Taunton MJ; Fehring TK; Edwards P; Bernasek T; Holt GE; Christie MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):428-34. PubMed ID: 21997785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. TOTAL HIP JOINT REPLACEMENT USING A CUSTOM TRIFLANGE ACETABULAR COMPONENT (LITERATURE REVIEW).
Galuzinskii O; Chornyi V; Kozik Y; Fedin Y
Wiad Lek; 2023; 76(12):2694-2699. PubMed ID: 38290035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of Custom Flange Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty and Predictors of Failure.
Barlow BT; Oi KK; Lee YY; Carli AV; Choi DS; Bostrom MP
J Arthroplasty; 2016 May; 31(5):1057-64. PubMed ID: 26742903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review.
De Martino I; D'Apolito R; Soranoglou VG; Poultsides LA; Sculco PK; Sculco TP
Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(ASuppl1):18-24. PubMed ID: 28042114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Custom Triflange Acetabular Implants: Average 10-Year Follow-Up.
Meding JB; Meding LK
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S201-S205. PubMed ID: 36958713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-centre radiological survivorship of acetabular distraction technique for treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity: mean five-year follow-up.
Sheth NP; Melnic CM; Brown N; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jul; 100-B(7):909-914. PubMed ID: 29954194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of dual-mobility acetabular implants on revision and survivorship of cup and Kerboull-type reinforcement ring constructs in aseptic acetabular loosening.
Bozon O; Dagneaux L; Sanchez T; Gaillard F; Hamoui M; Canovas F
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 108(2):103071. PubMed ID: 34560312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
Chiarlone F; Zanirato A; Cavagnaro L; Alessio-Mazzola M; Felli L; Burastero G
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Mar; 140(3):415-424. PubMed ID: 31960168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using an Uncemented Deep Profile Jumbo Component: A Ten to Sixteen Year Follow-Up Study.
McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):496-499. PubMed ID: 28993083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there a problem with modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up?
Hernandez NM; Hinton ZW; Wu CJ; Lachiewicz PF; Ryan SP; Wellman SS
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7 Supple B):66-72. PubMed ID: 34192910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acetabular Distraction Technique for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Discontinuities: Excellent Short-Term Implant Survivorship and Good Clinical Outcomes.
Bingham JS; Arthur JR; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2966-2971. PubMed ID: 32553514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstruction of failed acetabular component in the presence of severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review.
Volpin A; Konan S; Biz C; Tansey RJ; Haddad FS
Musculoskelet Surg; 2019 Apr; 103(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 29654551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
