These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31213376)

  • 1. Surgical aortic valve replacement with new-generation bioprostheses: Sutureless versus rapid-deployment.
    D'Onofrio A; Salizzoni S; Filippini C; Tessari C; Bagozzi L; Messina A; Troise G; Tomba MD; Rambaldini M; Dalén M; Alamanni F; Massetti M; Mignosa C; Russo C; Salvador L; Di Bartolomeo R; Maselli D; De Paulis R; Alfieri O; De Filippo CM; Portoghese M; Bortolotti U; Rinaldi M; Gerosa G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Feb; 159(2):432-442.e1. PubMed ID: 31213376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemodynamic Comparison of Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Valves with Conventional Bioprostheses.
    Gotzmann M; Wilbring M; Charitos E; Treede H; Silaschi M
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 68(7):584-594. PubMed ID: 30900219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sutureless Versus Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a Multicenter Registry.
    Berretta P; Meuris B; Kappert U; Andreas M; Fiore A; Solinas M; Misfeld M; Carrel TP; Villa E; Savini C; Santarpino G; Teoh K; Albertini A; Fischlein T; Martinelli G; Mignosa C; Glauber M; Shrestha M; Laufer G; Phan K; Yan T; Di Eusanio M
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Sep; 114(3):758-765. PubMed ID: 34563505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Meco M; Montisci A; Miceli A; Panisi P; Donatelli F; Cirri S; Ferrarini M; Lio A; Glauber M
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Feb; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 29453309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct Comparison of the Edwards Intuity Elite and Sorin Perceval S Rapid Deployment Aortic Valves.
    Liakopoulos OJ; Gerfer S; Weider S; Rahmanian P; Zeriouh M; Eghbalzadeh K; Sabashnikov A; Choi YH; Wippermann J; Wahlers T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Jan; 105(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 29042007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement with the Perceval S and Intuity Elite.
    Liakopoulos OJ; Gerfer S; Rahmanian P; Eghbalzadeh K; Djordjevic I; Schlachtenberger G; Zeriouh M; Mader N; Choi YH; Wahlers T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 69(5):412-419. PubMed ID: 33099764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. TRANSFORM (Multicenter Experience With Rapid Deployment Edwards INTUITY Valve System for Aortic Valve Replacement) US clinical trial: Performance of a rapid deployment aortic valve.
    Barnhart GR; Accola KD; Grossi EA; Woo YJ; Mumtaz MA; Sabik JF; Slachman FN; Patel HJ; Borger MA; Garrett HE; Rodriguez E; McCarthy PM; Ryan WH; Duhay FG; Mack MJ; Chitwood WR;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Feb; 153(2):241-251.e2. PubMed ID: 27817951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aortic valve replacement in elderly with small aortic root and low body surface area; the Perceval S valve and its impact in effective orifice area.
    Dedeilias P; Baikoussis NG; Prappa E; Asvestas D; Argiriou M; Charitos C
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 11(1):54. PubMed ID: 27066903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thrombocytopenia after Implantation of the Perceval, Intuity, and Sapien Aortic Valve Prostheses.
    Haeussler A; Ntinopoulos V; Rings L; Papadopoulos N; Hoti G; Fleckenstein P; Dzemali O
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Oct; 71(7):550-556. PubMed ID: 36462753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sutureless Perceval aortic valve in comparison with the stented Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve.
    König KC; Wahlers T; Scherner M; Wippermann J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 25076560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.
    Kocher AA; Laufer G; Haverich A; Shrestha M; Walther T; Misfeld M; Kempfert J; Gillam L; Schmitz C; Wahlers TC; Wippermann J; Mohr FW; Roth M; Skwara A; Rahmanian P; Wiedemann D; Borger MA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Jan; 145(1):110-5; discussion 115-6. PubMed ID: 23058665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Meta-Analysis of Sutureless or Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Takagi H; Umemoto T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 64(5):400-9. PubMed ID: 26606268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sutureless versus Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized PERSIST-AVR Study Design.
    Lorusso R; Folliguet T; Shrestha M; Meuris B; Kappetein AP; Roselli E; Klersy C; Nozza M; Verhees L; Larracas C; Goisis G; Fischlein T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Mar; 68(2):114-123. PubMed ID: 30497085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sutureless and rapid deployment versus sutured aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched comparison from the Sutureless and Rapid Deployment International Registry.
    Berretta P; Andreas M; Meuris B; Langenaeken T; Solinas M; Concistrè G; Kappert U; Arzt S; Santarpino G; Nicoletti A; Misfeld M; Borger MA; Savini C; Gliozzi G; Albertini A; Mikus E; Fischlein T; Kalisnik J; Martinelli GL; Cotroneo A; Mignosa C; Ricasoli A; Yan T; Laufer G; Di Eusanio M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Jul; 62(2):. PubMed ID: 35775935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stent deformation in a sutureless aortic valve bioprosthesis: a pilot observational analysis using imaging and three-dimensional modelling.
    Aljalloud A; Spetsotaki K; Tewarie L; Rossato L; Steinseifer U; Autschbach R; Menne M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2022 Jun; 62(1):. PubMed ID: 34791144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement versus standard bioprosthesis implantation.
    Ferrari E; Roduit C; Salamin P; Caporali E; Demertzis S; Tozzi P; Berdajs D; von Segesser L
    J Card Surg; 2017 Jun; 32(6):322-327. PubMed ID: 28493342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tackling the Issue of High Postoperative Pacemaker Implantation Rates in Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement: Should Balloon Inflation be Removed from the Implantation Method of the Perceval Prosthesis?
    Charles Blouin M; Bouhout I; Demers P; Carrier M; Perrault L; Lamarche Y; El-Hamamsy I; Bouchard D
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 May; 26(3):247-254. PubMed ID: 29092107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis.
    Fischlein T; Folliguet T; Meuris B; Shrestha ML; Roselli EE; McGlothlin A; Kappert U; Pfeiffer S; Corbi P; Lorusso R;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2021 Mar; 161(3):920-932. PubMed ID: 33478837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aortic Valve Replacement with a Conventional Stented Bioprosthesis versus Sutureless Bioprosthesis: a Study of 763 Patients.
    Mujtaba SS; Ledingham SM; Shah AR; Pillay T; Schueler S; Clark S
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2018; 33(2):122-128. PubMed ID: 29898140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.