BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31213407)

  • 1. The Impact of Partial Weak Staining in Normal Breast Epithelium on the Reliability of Immunohistochemistry Results in HercepTest-positive Breast Cancer.
    Farra C; Fedda F; Tfayli A; Tawil A; Zaatari G; Ashkar H; Issa G; Boulos F
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(5):340-344. PubMed ID: 31213407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gene protein detection platform--a comparison of a new human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assay with conventional immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization platforms.
    Stålhammar G; Farrajota P; Olsson A; Silva C; Hartman J; Elmberger G
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2015 Aug; 19(4):203-10. PubMed ID: 25921313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
    Varga Z; Noske A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amplification of the HER2 gene in breast cancers testing 2+ weak positive by HercepTest immunohistochemistry: false-positive or false-negative immunohistochemistry?
    Barrett C; Magee H; O'Toole D; Daly S; Jeffers M
    J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 60(6):690-3. PubMed ID: 16822876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
    Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Recommendations in a tertiary care facility increases HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance and decreases the number of inconclusive cases.
    Middleton LP; Price KM; Puig P; Heydon LJ; Tarco E; Sneige N; Barr K; Deavers MT
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 May; 133(5):775-80. PubMed ID: 19415952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
    Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New ASCO/CAP guideline recommendations for HER2 testing increase the proportion of reflex in situ hybridization tests and of HER2 positive breast cancers.
    Tchrakian N; Flanagan L; Harford J; Gannon JM; Quinn CM
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Feb; 468(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 26521061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry.
    Taylor VJ; Barnes PJ; Godwin SC; Bethune GC
    Virchows Arch; 2021 Jul; 479(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 33527151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Dako HercepTest and Ventana PATHWAY Anti-HER2 (4B5) Tests and Their Correlation With Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization in Breast Carcinoma.
    Lucas E; Jabbar SB; Molberg K; Fang Y; Xie XJ; Blacketer S; Sahoo S
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2019 Jul; 27(6):403-409. PubMed ID: 31233398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
    Bethune GC; Pettit AS; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; Barnes PJ
    Histopathology; 2017 May; 70(6):966-974. PubMed ID: 28032917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HER2 amplification ratios by fluorescence in situ hybridization and correlation with immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 6556 breast cancer tissues.
    Owens MA; Horten BC; Da Silva MM
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2004 Apr; 5(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 15140287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.
    Liu ZH; Wang K; Lin DY; Xu J; Chen J; Long XY; Ge Y; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Liu YH; Xu FP
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 30712197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.
    Fan YS; Casas CE; Peng J; Watkins M; Fan L; Chapman J; Ikpatt OF; Gomez C; Zhao W; Reis IM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 26895325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential prognostic value of positive HER2 status determined by immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast cancer.
    Stocker A; Trojan A; Elfgen C; Hilbers ML; Moskovszky L; Varga Z
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 32638236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Change in Pattern of HER2 Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Results in Breast Cancers Submitted for FISH Testing: Experience of a Reference Laboratory Using US Food and Drug Administration Criteria and American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Guidelines.
    Shah MV; Wiktor AE; Meyer RG; Tenner KS; Ballman KV; Green SJ; Sukov WR; Ketterling RP; Perez EA; Jenkins RB
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(29):3502-3510. PubMed ID: 27458302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations on HER2 interpretation in breast cancer.
    Shah SS; Ketterling RP; Goetz MP; Ingle JN; Reynolds CA; Perez EA; Chen B
    Hum Pathol; 2010 Jan; 41(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 19762065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastroesophageal cancer: correlation between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Tafe LJ; Janjigian YY; Zaidinski M; Hedvat CV; Hameed MR; Tang LH; Hicks JB; Shah MA; Barbashina V
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1460-5. PubMed ID: 22032573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. HER2-testing in 538 consecutive breast cancer cases using FISH and immunohistochemistry.
    Kovács A; Stenman G
    Pathol Res Pract; 2010 Jan; 206(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 19819642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.
    Wang B; Ding W; Sun K; Wang X; Xu L; Teng X
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16726. PubMed ID: 31723206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.