These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31213448)

  • 1. Mixed methods evaluation of a hospital group model using an embedded research approach: study protocol.
    Vindrola-Padros C; Capelas Barbosa E; Ramsay AIG; Turner S; Morris S; Agble R; Caldwell-Nichols A; Fulop NJ
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e027086. PubMed ID: 31213448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol.
    Wagstaff D; Moonesinghe SR; Fulop NJ; Vindrola-Padros C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e030214. PubMed ID: 31296515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mixed methods evaluation of the Getting it Right First Time programme - improvements to NHS orthopaedic care in England: study protocol.
    Barratt H; Turner S; Hutchings A; Pizzo E; Hudson E; Briggs T; Hurd R; Day J; Yates R; Gikas P; Morris S; Fulop NJ; Raine R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jan; 17(1):71. PubMed ID: 28115018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the implementation and impact of a new model of care for integrating children and young people's acute mental healthcare in a paediatric setting: a protocol for a realist, mixed-methods approach.
    Otis M; Barber S; Green Hofer S; Straus J; Kay M; Hargreaves DS; Hayhoe B; Anokye N; Lennox L; Nicholls D
    BMJ Open; 2023 Jan; 13(1):e067074. PubMed ID: 36669846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. REducing unwarranted variation in the Delivery of high qUality hip fraCture services in England and Wales (REDUCE): protocol for a mixed-methods study.
    Patel R; Drew S; Johansen A; Chesser T; Javaid MK; Griffin XL; Jones T; Griffin J; Bradshaw M; Whale K; Barbosa EC; Marques EMR; Ben-Shlomo Y; Gooberman-Hill R; Judge A; Gregson CL
    BMJ Open; 2021 May; 11(5):e049763. PubMed ID: 34011603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protocol for a process-oriented qualitative evaluation of the Waltham Forest and East London Collaborative (WELC) integrated care pioneer programme using the Researcher-in-Residence model.
    Eyre L; George B; Marshall M
    BMJ Open; 2015 Nov; 5(11):e009567. PubMed ID: 26546147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Formative independent evaluation of a digital change programme in the English National Health Service: study protocol for a longitudinal qualitative study.
    Cresswell K; Sheikh A; Dean Franklin B; Krasuska M; Nguyen H; Hinder S; Lane W; Mozaffar H; Mason K; Eason S; Potts H; Williams R
    BMJ Open; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e041275. PubMed ID: 33033100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the digital diabetes prevention programme pilot: uncontrolled mixed-methods study protocol.
    Murray E; Daff K; Lavida A; Henley W; Irwin J; Valabhji J
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e025903. PubMed ID: 31122973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes enhanced by self-management strategies to battle sedentary behaviour in older adults: protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the SITLESS three-armed pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
    Deidda M; Coll-Planas L; Giné-Garriga M; Guerra-Balic M; Roqué I Figuls M; Tully MA; Caserotti P; Rothenbacher D; Salvà Casanovas A; Kee F; Blackburn NE; Wilson JJ; Skjødt M; Denkinger M; Wirth K; McIntosh E;
    BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e022266. PubMed ID: 30327403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts.
    Fulop N; Barbosa EC; Hill M; Ledger J; Sherlaw-Johnson C; Spencer J; Vindrola-Padros C; Morris S
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2020 Apr; 9(4):143-151. PubMed ID: 32331494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standardising costs or standardising care? Qualitative evaluation of the implementation and impact of a hospital funding reform in Ontario, Canada.
    Palmer KS; Brown AD; Evans JM; Marani H; Russell KK; Martin D; Ivers NM
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Aug; 16(1):74. PubMed ID: 30075735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a complex integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program (isPO): a mixed-methods study protocol.
    Jenniches I; Lemmen C; Cwik JC; Kusch M; Labouvie H; Scholten N; Gerlach A; Stock S; Samel C; Hagemeier A; Hellmich M; Haas P; Hallek M; Pfaff H; Dresen A
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e034141. PubMed ID: 32156765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding and evaluating the effects of implementing an electronic paediatric prescribing system on care provision and hospital work in paediatric hospital ward settings: a qualitatively driven mixed-method study protocol.
    Farre A; Cummins C
    BMJ Open; 2016 Feb; 6(2):e010444. PubMed ID: 26842275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Gold Coast Integrated Care for patients with chronic disease or high risk of hospitalisation through a non-randomised controlled clinical trial: a pilot study protocol.
    Scuffham PA; Mihala G; Ward L; McMurray A; Connor M
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(6):e016776. PubMed ID: 28674147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol.
    Kapologwe NA; Kalolo A; Kibusi SM; Chaula Z; Nswilla A; Teuscher T; Aung K; Borghi J
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Jan; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 30700308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed Methods EvAluation of the high-volume low-complexity Surgical hUb pRogrammE (MEASURE): a mixed methods study protocol.
    Scantlebury A; Sivey P; Anteneh Z; Ayres B; Bloor K; Castelli A; Castro-Avila AC; Davies F; Davies S; Glerum-Brooks K; Gutacker N; Lampard P; Rangan A; Saad A; Street A; Wen J; Adamson J
    BMJ Open; 2024 Apr; 14(4):e086338. PubMed ID: 38643003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study.
    Nurjono M; Shrestha P; Lee A; Lim XY; Shiraz F; Tan S; Wong SH; Foo KM; Wee T; Toh SA; Yoong J; Maria Vrijhoef HJ
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e017111. PubMed ID: 29500199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating process and clinical outcomes of a primary care mental health integration project in rural Rwanda: a prospective mixed-methods protocol.
    Smith SL; Misago CN; Osrow RA; Franke MF; Iyamuremye JD; Dusabeyezu JD; Mohand AA; Anatole M; Kayiteshonga Y; Raviola GJ
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e014067. PubMed ID: 28246140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementing universal Lynch syndrome screening (IMPULSS): protocol for a multi-site study to identify strategies to implement, adapt, and sustain genomic medicine programs in different organizational contexts.
    Rahm AK; Cragun D; Hunter JE; Epstein MM; Lowery J; Lu CY; Pawloski PA; Sharaf RN; Liang SY; Burnett-Hartman AN; Gudgeon JM; Hao J; Snyder S; Gogoi R; Ladd I; Williams MS
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Oct; 18(1):824. PubMed ID: 30376847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.