BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31214067)

  • 1. The Bayesian Expectation-Maximization-Maximization for the 3PLM.
    Guo S; Zheng C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1175. PubMed ID: 31214067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expectation-Maximization-Maximization: A Feasible MLE Algorithm for the Three-Parameter Logistic Model Based on a Mixture Modeling Reformulation.
    Zheng C; Meng X; Guo S; Liu Z
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2302. PubMed ID: 29354089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian Modal Estimation for the One-Parameter Logistic Ability-Based Guessing (1PL-AG) Model.
    Guo S; Wu T; Zheng C; Chen Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 May; 45(3):195-213. PubMed ID: 33958835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The robust estimation of examinee ability based on the four-parameter logistic model when guessing and carelessness responses exist.
    Jian X; Buyun D; Yuanping D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250268. PubMed ID: 33914784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IRTBEMM: An R Package for Estimating IRT Models With Guessing or Slipping Parameters.
    Guo S; Zheng C; Kern JL
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Oct; 44(7-8):566-567. PubMed ID: 34565936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating Confidence Intervals of Item Parameters When Some Item Parameters Take Priors in the 2PL and 3PL Models.
    Paek I; Lin Z; Chalmers RP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):375-400. PubMed ID: 36866071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginalized maximum a posteriori estimation for the four-parameter logistic model under a mixture modelling framework.
    Meng X; Xu G; Zhang J; Tao J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():51-82. PubMed ID: 31552688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the 1PL-AG IRT Model.
    Park R; Pituch KA; Kim J; Dodd BG; Chung H
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Sep; 39(6):448-464. PubMed ID: 29881018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mixture class recovery in GMM under varying degrees of class separation: frequentist versus Bayesian estimation.
    Depaoli S
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Jun; 18(2):186-219. PubMed ID: 23527607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian Prior Choice in IRT Estimation Using MCMC and Variational Bayes.
    Natesan P; Nandakumar R; Minka T; Rubright JD
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1422. PubMed ID: 27729878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using Auxiliary Item Information in the Item Parameter Estimation of a Graded Response Model for a Small to Medium Sample Size: Empirical Versus Hierarchical Bayes Estimation.
    Naveiras M; Cho SJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Nov; 47(7-8):478-495. PubMed ID: 38027461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expectation maximization based framework for joint localization and parameter estimation in single particle tracking from segmented images.
    Lin Y; Andersson SB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0243115. PubMed ID: 34019541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Averaging, maximum penalized likelihood and Bayesian estimation for improving Gaussian mixture probability density estimates.
    Ormoneit D; Tresp V
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 1998; 9(4):639-50. PubMed ID: 18252487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian Modal Estimation of the Four-Parameter Item Response Model in Real, Realistic, and Idealized Data Sets.
    Waller NG; Feuerstahler L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):350-370. PubMed ID: 28306347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rasch Model Parameter Estimation in the Presence of a Nonnormal Latent Trait Using a Nonparametric Bayesian Approach.
    Finch H; Edwards JM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):662-684. PubMed ID: 29795882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.
    Pradhan S; Song B; Lee J; Chae JW; Kim KI; Back HM; Han N; Kwon KI; Yun HY
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 29191177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An EM-Based Method for Q-Matrix Validation.
    Wang W; Song L; Ding S; Meng Y; Cao C; Jie Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Sep; 42(6):446-459. PubMed ID: 30787487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the Expectation-Maximization Algorithm for Rice-Rayleigh Mixtures With Application to Noise Parameter Estimation in Magnitude MR Datasets.
    Maitra R
    Sankhya B (2008); 2013 Nov; 75(2):293-318. PubMed ID: 29757335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the performance of FOCE and different expectation-maximization methods in handling complex population physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models.
    Liu X; Wang Y
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Aug; 43(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 27215925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correction for Item Response Theory Latent Trait Measurement Error in Linear Mixed Effects Models.
    Wang C; Xu G; Zhang X
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):673-700. PubMed ID: 31183670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.