These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31214908)

  • 21. Influence of the Perceived Infidelity of Online Sexual Activities (OSAs) on OSA Experiences Among Chinese Heterosexual Individuals in Committed Relationships.
    Li D; Zheng L
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2018; 44(8):746-758. PubMed ID: 29648965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceived consequences of casual online sexual activities on heterosexual relationships: a u.s. Online survey.
    Grov C; Gillespie BJ; Royce T; Lever J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Apr; 40(2):429-39. PubMed ID: 20174862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perceptions of primary and secondary relationships in polyamory.
    Balzarini RN; Campbell L; Kohut T; Holmes BM; Lehmiller JJ; Harman JJ; Atkins N
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177841. PubMed ID: 28542619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is monogamy or committed relationship status a marker for low sexual risk among men in substance abuse treatment? Clinical and methodological considerations.
    Calsyn DA; Campbell AN; Tross S; Hatch-Maillette MA
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2011 Sep; 37(5):294-300. PubMed ID: 21854271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relationship stigma and relationship outcomes in interracial and same-sex relationships: Examination of sources and buffers.
    Rosenthal L; Starks TJ
    J Fam Psychol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):818-30. PubMed ID: 26121534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Maximizing relationship possibilities: relational maximization in romantic relationships.
    Mikkelson AC; Pauley PM
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(4):467-85. PubMed ID: 23951952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships.
    Conley TD; Ziegler A; Moors AC; Matsick JL; Valentine B
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2013 May; 17(2):124-41. PubMed ID: 23175520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An Interpersonal Investigation of Sexual Self-Schemas.
    Mueller K; Rehman US; Fallis EE; Goodnight JA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2016 Feb; 45(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 26545914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Monogamy and Nonmonogamy: Evolutionary Considerations and Treatment Challenges.
    Brandon M
    Sex Med Rev; 2016 Oct; 4(4):343-352. PubMed ID: 27872028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sociosexual Attitudes and Quality of Life in (Non)Monogamous Relationships: The Role of Attraction and Constraining Forces Among Users of the Second Love Web Site.
    Rodrigues DL; Lopes D; Pereira M; De Visser R; Cabaceira I
    Arch Sex Behav; 2019 Aug; 48(6):1795-1809. PubMed ID: 30607714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting commitment in young adults' physically aggressive and sexually coercive dating relationships.
    Young BJ; Furman W
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Nov; 28(17):3245-64. PubMed ID: 23920336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigation of Consensually Nonmonogamous Relationships.
    Conley T; Matsick J; Moors AC; Ziegler A
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2017 Mar; 12(2):205-232. PubMed ID: 28346120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relational Motives Reduce Attentional Adhesion to Attractive Alternatives in Heterosexual University Students in China.
    Zhang Q; Maner JK; Xu Y; Zheng Y
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Feb; 46(2):503-511. PubMed ID: 27173104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship problems and extradyadic romantic and sexual activity in a web-sample of Norwegian men and women.
    Træen B; Thuen F
    Scand J Psychol; 2013 Apr; 54(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 23252347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Romantic relationship configurations and their correlates among LGBTQ+ persons: A latent class analysis.
    Cannas Aghedu F; Blais M; Séguin LJ; Côté I
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0309954. PubMed ID: 39269934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. "We Agree and Now Everything Goes My Way": Consensual Sexual Nonmonogamy, Extradyadic Sex, and Relationship Satisfaction.
    Rodrigues D; Lopes D; Pereira M
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2016 Jun; 19(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 27327064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Symbolic Nature of Trust in Heterosexual Adolescent Romantic Relationships.
    Norona JC; Welsh DP; Olmstead SB; Bliton CF
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Aug; 46(6):1673-1684. PubMed ID: 28508300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Men's Benefit-Provisioning Mate Retention Behavior Mediates the Relationship Between Their Agreeableness and Their Oral Sex Behaviors.
    Pham MN; Shackelford TK; Holden CJ; Zeigler-Hill V; Sela Y; Jeffery AJ
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Aug; 44(6):1723-8. PubMed ID: 25239660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy.
    Balzarini RN; McDonald JN; Kohut T; Lehmiller JJ; Holmes BM; Harman JJ
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 May; 50(4):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 34041641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sexual desire and relationship duration in young men and women.
    Murray SH; Milhausen RR
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2012; 38(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 22268980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.