234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31215045)
41. Root Canal Morphologies of Mesiobuccal Roots of Maxillary Molars using Cone beam Computed Tomography and Periapical Radiographic Techniques in an Iranian Population.
Zand V; Mokhtari H; Zonouzi HR; Shojaei SN
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):745-749. PubMed ID: 28874634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A Deep Learning Approach to Segment and Classify C-Shaped Canal Morphologies in Mandibular Second Molars Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Sherwood AA; Sherwood AI; Setzer FC; K SD; Shamili JV; John C; Schwendicke F
J Endod; 2021 Dec; 47(12):1907-1916. PubMed ID: 34563507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prevalence of C-shaped canal and related variations in maxillary and mandibular second molars in the Indian Subpopulation: A cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
Singh T; Kumari M; Kochhar R; Iqbal S
J Conserv Dent; 2022; 25(5):531-535. PubMed ID: 36506623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Root canal morphology and variations in mandibular second molars: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
Gomez F; Brea G; Gomez-Sosa JF
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):424. PubMed ID: 34470619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A biometric study of C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars using cone-beam computed tomography.
Seo DG; Gu Y; Yi YA; Lee SJ; Jeong JS; Lee Y; Chang SW; Lee JK; Park W; Kim KD; Kum KY
Int Endod J; 2012 Sep; 45(9):807-14. PubMed ID: 22432971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Evaluation of the internal anatomy of paramolar tubercles using cone-beam computed tomography.
Colakoglu G; Kaya Buyukbayram I; Elcin MA; Kazak M; Sezer H
Surg Radiol Anat; 2020 Jan; 42(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 31659406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Morphology of mandibular first molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals.
Kim SY; Kim BS; Woo J; Kim Y
J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1516-21. PubMed ID: 24238439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Root canal morphology and symmetry of mandibular second premolars using cone-beam computed tomography.
Alghamdi FT; Khalil WA
Oral Radiol; 2022 Jan; 38(1):126-138. PubMed ID: 33963988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of the Root Canal Anatomy of Maxillary and Mandibular Premolars in a Selected German Population Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Data.
Bürklein S; Heck R; Schäfer E
J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1448-1452. PubMed ID: 28743430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of root and canal anatomy of taurodont and normal molar teeth: A retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study.
Aydın H; Mobaraki S
Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Oct; 130():105242. PubMed ID: 34411883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. C-Shaped canal system in mandibular premolars evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography in a population of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Chaintiou Piorno R; Consoli Lizzi EP; Gualtieri AF; Rodríguez PA
Arch Oral Biol; 2021 Mar; 123():105040. PubMed ID: 33454421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars in an Emirati population.
Khawaja S; Alharbi N; Chaudhry J; Khamis AH; Abed RE; Ghoneima A; Jamal M
Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):23863. PubMed ID: 34903785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Prevalence of C-shaped canals in mandibular second and third molars in a central India population: A cone beam computed tomography analysis.
Wadhwani S; Singh MP; Agarwal M; Somasundaram P; Rawtiya M; Wadhwani PK
J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(5):351-354. PubMed ID: 29386785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of root canal morphology of human primary molars by using CBCT and comprehensive review of the literature.
Ozcan G; Sekerci AE; Cantekin K; Aydinbelge M; Dogan S
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 26523502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Prevalence of complex root canal morphology in the mandibular first and second premolars in Thai population: CBCT analysis.
Thanaruengrong P; Kulvitit S; Navachinda M; Charoenlarp P
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):449. PubMed ID: 34530811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a polish population.
Olczak K; Pawlicka H
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Dec; 17(1):68. PubMed ID: 29284426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Evaluation of root anatomy of permanent mandibular premolars and molars in a Korean population with cone-beam computed tomography.
Park JB; Kim N; Park S; Kim Y; Ko Y
Eur J Dent; 2013 Jan; 7(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 23407684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary molars in a Brazilian population using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging: an in vivo study.
Silva EJ; Nejaim Y; Silva AI; Haiter-Neto F; Zaia AA; Cohenca N
J Endod; 2014 Feb; 40(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 24461399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Anatomic Features of C-shaped Mandibular Second Molars in a Selected Iranian Population Using CBCT.
Janani M; Rahimi S; Jafari F; Johari M; Nikniaz S; Ghasemi N
Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(1):120-125. PubMed ID: 29692847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Prevalence of C-shaped Configurations in the Mandibular First and Second Premolars: A Cone-beam Computed Tomographic In Vivo Study.
Martins JNR; Francisco H; Ordinola-Zapata R
J Endod; 2017 Jun; 43(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 28389074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
