These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31215430)

  • 21. Correlation of online assessment parameters with summative exam performance in undergraduate medical education of pharmacology: a prospective cohort study.
    Kühbeck F; Berberat PO; Engelhardt S; Sarikas A
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Nov; 19(1):412. PubMed ID: 31703687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
    Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Peer review improves psychometric characteristics of multiple choice questions.
    Abozaid H; Park YS; Tekian A
    Med Teach; 2017 Apr; 39(sup1):S50-S54. PubMed ID: 28103718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Post-exam feedback with question rationales improves re-test performance of medical students on a multiple-choice exam.
    Levant B; Zückert W; Paolo A
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Dec; 23(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 30043313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving the ability to discriminate medical multiple-choice questions through the analysis of the competitive examination to assign residency positions in Spain.
    Murias Quintana E; Rodríguez Castro J; Sánchez Lasheras F; Vega Villar J; Curbelo García JJ; Cadenas Rodríguez M; Baladrón Romero J
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Apr; 24(1):367. PubMed ID: 38570816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The psychometric properties of five scoring methods applied to the script concordance test.
    Bland AC; Kreiter CD; Gordon JA
    Acad Med; 2005 Apr; 80(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 15793026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology.
    Grumer M; Brüstle P; Lambeck J; Biller S; Brich J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0224131. PubMed ID: 31626678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of key feature questions in summative assessment of veterinary medicine students.
    Schaper E; Tipold A; Ehlers JP
    Ir Vet J; 2013 Mar; 66(1):3. PubMed ID: 23497425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity of very short answer versus single best answer questions for undergraduate assessment.
    Sam AH; Hameed S; Harris J; Meeran K
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):266. PubMed ID: 27737661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Introduction of patient video clips into computer-based testing: effects on item statistics and reliability estimates.
    Lieberman SA; Frye AW; Litwins SD; Rasmusson KA; Boulet JR
    Acad Med; 2003 Oct; 78(10 Suppl):S48-51. PubMed ID: 14557094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attitudes and performance of third- vs fourth-year neurology clerkship students.
    Dewey RB; Agostini M
    Arch Neurol; 2010 May; 67(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 20457953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Academic outcomes of a community-based longitudinal integrated clerkships program.
    Latessa R; Beaty N; Royal K; Colvin G; Pathman DE; Heck J
    Med Teach; 2015; 37(9):862-7. PubMed ID: 25693796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Feedback in formative OSCEs: comparison between direct observation and video-based formats.
    Junod Perron N; Louis-Simonet M; Cerutti B; Pfarrwaller E; Sommer J; Nendaz M
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():32160. PubMed ID: 27834170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A psychometric evaluation of the anatomy learning experiences questionnaire and correlations with learning outcomes.
    Choi-Lundberg DL; Williams AM; Zimitat C
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):514-527. PubMed ID: 28423232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of cueing on written examinations of clinical decision making: a case study.
    Desjardins I; Touchie C; Pugh D; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2014 Mar; 48(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 24528460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Authenticity of instruction and student performance: a prospective randomised trial.
    La Rochelle JS; Durning SJ; Pangaro LN; Artino AR; van der Vleuten CP; Schuwirth L
    Med Educ; 2011 Aug; 45(8):807-17. PubMed ID: 21752077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attitudes of affiliate faculty members toward medical student summative evaluation for clinical clerkships: a qualitative analysis.
    Wang KE; Fitzpatrick C; George D; Lane L
    Teach Learn Med; 2012; 24(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 22250930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of online formative assessment on summative performance in integrated musculoskeletal system module.
    Mitra NK; Barua A
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():29. PubMed ID: 25884641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the effect of items' format and type on psychometric properties of sixth year pharmacy students clinical clerkship assessment items.
    AlKhatib HS; Brazeau G; Akour A; Almuhaissen SA
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Jun; 20(1):190. PubMed ID: 32532278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of changing multiple choice questions from "all of the above" to "select all that apply".
    Dell KA; DeVries DM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2024 Mar; 16(3):174-177. PubMed ID: 38218657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.