These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis. van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM; Viechtbauer W Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):225-239. PubMed ID: 30589219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown. Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved methods to construct prediction intervals for network meta-analysis. Noma H; Hamura Y; Sugasawa S; Furukawa TA Res Synth Methods; 2023 Nov; 14(6):794-806. PubMed ID: 37399809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Guolo A BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):6. PubMed ID: 28077079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An alternative pseudolikelihood method for multivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Chen Y; Hong C; Riley RD Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):361-80. PubMed ID: 25363629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confidence intervals for a random-effects meta-analysis based on Bartlett-type corrections. Noma H Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3304-12. PubMed ID: 21964669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects. Law M; Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 27465416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exact inference on the random-effects model for meta-analyses with few studies. Michael H; Thornton S; Xie M; Tian L Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30430540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjusted closed-form confidence interval formulas for network meta-analysis with a small number of studies. Kojima M Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):457-469. PubMed ID: 36539211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Capturing the underlying distribution in meta-analysis: Credibility and tolerance intervals. Brannick MT; French KA; Rothstein HR; Kiselica AM; Apostoloski N Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):264-290. PubMed ID: 33543583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inference for correlated effect sizes using multiple univariate meta-analyses. Chen Y; Cai Y; Hong C; Jackson D Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1405-22. PubMed ID: 26537017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]