These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31215819)

  • 1. Compensated active noise cancellation earphone for audiometric screening tests in noisy environments.
    Chang HY; Luo CH; Lo TS; Tai CC
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Nov; 58(11):747-753. PubMed ID: 31215819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of background noise on earphone thresholds.
    Frank T; Williams DL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 8318711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of user volume control settings for portable music players with three earphone configurations in quiet and noisy environments.
    Henry P; Foots A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 22436116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing thresholds, threshold repeatability, and attenuation values for passive noise-reducing earphone enclosures.
    Frank T; Greer AC; Magistro DM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Nov; 58(11):772-8. PubMed ID: 9373922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold.
    Berger EH; Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Associations between adolescents' earphone usage in noisy environments, hearing loss, and self-reported hearing problems in a nationally representative sample of South Korean middle and high school students.
    Byeon H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jan; 100(3):e24056. PubMed ID: 33546006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporary threshold shifts at 1500 and 2000 Hz induced by loud voice signals communicated through earphones in the pinball industry.
    Idota N; Horie S; Tsutsui T; Inoue J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Oct; 54(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 20584863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attenuation provided by four different audiometric earphone systems.
    Frank T; Wright DC
    Ear Hear; 1990 Feb; 11(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 2307308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation of young normal-hearing thresholds measured using different audiometric earphones: implications for the acoustic coupler and the ear simulator.
    Lawton BW
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Aug; 44(8):444-51. PubMed ID: 16149239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of earphone and sound field methods for estimating noise attenuation of foam earplugs.
    Carter NL; Upfold G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Jun; 54(6):307-12. PubMed ID: 8328360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiometric Thresholds: Stimulus Considerations in Sound Field and Under Earphones.
    Norrix LW; Anderson A
    Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 26650376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of warble tones in wideband noise with and without hearing protection devices.
    Letowski T; McGee L
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1993 Dec; 37(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 8304681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.