These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31216882)

  • 1. The Easier the Better? Comparing the Readability and Engagement of Online Pro- and Anti-Vaccination Articles.
    Xu Z; Ellis L; Umphrey LR
    Health Educ Behav; 2019 Oct; 46(5):790-797. PubMed ID: 31216882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readability comparison of pro- and anti-HPV-vaccination online messages in Japan.
    Okuhara T; Ishikawa H; Okada M; Kato M; Kiuchi T
    Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Oct; 100(10):1859-1866. PubMed ID: 28532860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A readability comparison of anti- versus pro-influenza vaccination online messages in Japan.
    Okuhara T; Ishikawa H; Okada M; Kato M; Kiuchi T
    Prev Med Rep; 2017 Jun; 6():47-52. PubMed ID: 28271020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability assessment of vaccine information: A systematic review for addressing vaccine hesitancy.
    Okuhara T; Ishikawa H; Ueno H; Okada H; Kato M; Kiuchi T
    Patient Educ Couns; 2022 Feb; 105(2):331-338. PubMed ID: 34090717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Readability of Online Resources for Mastopexy Surgery.
    Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 77(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 25536208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An assessment of the readability of online material related to fluoride.
    Basch CH; Ethan D; Cadorett V; Kollia B; Clark A
    J Prev Interv Community; 2019; 47(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 30806197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.
    Vargas CR; Ricci JA; Chuang DJ; Lee BT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Mar; 76(3):349-54. PubMed ID: 25695442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the readability of online foot and ankle patient education materials.
    Sheppard ED; Hyde Z; Florence MN; McGwin G; Kirchner JS; Ponce BA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Dec; 35(12):1282-6. PubMed ID: 25239196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.
    Prabhu AV; Kim C; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; DeFrances MC; Trejo Bittar HE
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Jul; 65():15-20. PubMed ID: 28504209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.
    Weiss KD; Vargas CR; Ho OA; Chuang DJ; Weiss J; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 27916381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining the Reading Level of Internet Medical Information for Common Internal Medicine Diagnoses.
    Hutchinson N; Baird GL; Garg M
    Am J Med; 2016 Jun; 129(6):637-9. PubMed ID: 26829438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
    Walsh TM; Volsko TA
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Online Patient Resources for Gender Affirmation Surgery: An Analysis of Readability.
    Kiwanuka E; Mehrzad R; Prsic A; Kwan D
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Oct; 79(4):329-333. PubMed ID: 28858881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability Comparison of Pro- and Anti-Cancer Screening Online Messages in Japan.
    Okuhara Ts; Ishikawa H; Okada M; Kato M; Kiuchi T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016 Dec; 17(12):5237-5242. PubMed ID: 28125867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Systematic analysis of the readability of patient information on the websites of clinics for plastic surgery].
    Esfahani BJ; Faron A; Roth KS; Schaller HE; Medved F; Lüers JC
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2014 Dec; 46(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 25412241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability and quality of wikipedia pages on neurosurgical topics.
    Modiri O; Guha D; Alotaibi NM; Ibrahim GM; Lipsman N; Fallah A
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 166():66-70. PubMed ID: 29408776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Online palliative care and oncology patient education resources through Google: Do they meet national health literacy recommendations?
    Prabhu AV; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; Glaser C; Clump DA; Heron DE; Beriwal S
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(5):306-310. PubMed ID: 28341318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.
    Eltorai AE; Sharma P; Wang J; Daniels AH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1181-6. PubMed ID: 25475715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.
    Eltorai AE; Han A; Truntzer J; Daniels AH
    Phys Sportsmed; 2014 Nov; 42(4):125-30. PubMed ID: 25419896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.