278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31217033)
1. A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.
Glonti K; Cauchi D; Cobo E; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMC Med; 2019 Jun; 17(1):118. PubMed ID: 31217033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.
Glonti K; Cauchi D; Cobo E; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017468. PubMed ID: 29061619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.
Galipeau J; Barbour V; Baskin P; Bell-Syer S; Cobey K; Cumpston M; Deeks J; Garner P; MacLehose H; Shamseer L; Straus S; Tugwell P; Wager E; Winker M; Moher D
BMC Med; 2016 Feb; 14():16. PubMed ID: 26837937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review of the biomedical literature.
Olson CM
Am J Emerg Med; 1990 Jul; 8(4):356-8. PubMed ID: 2194471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals.
Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR
J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research.
Superchi C; Hren D; Blanco D; Rius R; Recchioni A; Boutron I; González JA
BMJ Open; 2020 Jun; 10(6):e035604. PubMed ID: 32518211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.
Turner L; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Weeks L; Peters J; Kober T; Dias S; Schulz KF; Plint AC; Moher D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):MR000030. PubMed ID: 23152285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. JACLP Guide for Manuscript Peer Review: How to Perform a Peer Review and How to Be Responsive to Reviewer Comments.
Oldham MA; Kontos N; Baller E; Cerimele JM
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry; 2023; 64(5):468-472. PubMed ID: 36796760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis.
Herber OR; Bradbury-Jones C; Böling S; Combes S; Hirt J; Koop Y; Nyhagen R; Veldhuizen JD; Taylor J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):122. PubMed ID: 32423388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM
PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strategies for Developing Journal Peer Reviewers: A Scoping Review.
Gazza EA; Matthias AD; Griffin J; Chick K
Nurs Educ Perspect; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):93-99. PubMed ID: 37314363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC
BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.
Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Barnes C; Boutron I
BMC Med; 2015 Jul; 13():158. PubMed ID: 26141137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Journal editors' perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e035600. PubMed ID: 32792429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers' confidential comments to editors.
O'Brien BC; Artino AR; Costello JA; Driessen E; Maggio LA
PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0260558. PubMed ID: 34843564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review.
Ng JY; Cobey KD; Ahmed S; Chow V; Maduranayagam SG; Santoro LJ; Sikora L; Marusic A; Shanahan D; Townsend R; Ehrlich A; Iorio A; Moher D
PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282168. PubMed ID: 37000832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
