These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31217521)

  • 1. Working memory capacity affects trade-off between quality and quantity only when stimulus exposure duration is sufficient: Evidence for the two-phase model.
    Ye C; Sun HJ; Xu Q; Liang T; Zhang Y; Liu Q
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):8727. PubMed ID: 31217521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Looking sharp: Becoming a search template boosts precision and stability in visual working memory.
    Rajsic J; Ouslis NE; Wilson DE; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 28537011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A two-phase model of resource allocation in visual working memory.
    Ye C; Hu Z; Li H; Ristaniemi T; Liu Q; Liu T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1557-1566. PubMed ID: 28252988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attention mediates the flexible allocation of visual working memory resources.
    Emrich SM; Lockhart HA; Al-Aidroos N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1454-1465. PubMed ID: 28368161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The transition from feature to object: Storage unit in visual working memory depends on task difficulty.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Liu S; Lei Q
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1498-1514. PubMed ID: 31267436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The aftermath of memory retrieval for recycling visual working memory representations.
    Park HB; Zhang W; Hyun JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1393-1407. PubMed ID: 28378282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive allocation of human visual working memory capacity during statistical and categorical learning.
    Bates CJ; Lerch RA; Sims CR; Jacobs RA
    J Vis; 2019 Feb; 19(2):11. PubMed ID: 30802280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Negative emotional state modulates visual working memory in the late consolidation phase.
    Long F; Ye C; Li Z; Tian Y; Liu Q
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Dec; 34(8):1646-1663. PubMed ID: 32686579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision requirements do not affect the allocation of visual working memory capacity.
    He X; Zhang W; Li C; Guo C
    Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1602():136-43. PubMed ID: 25625356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The steady-state visual evoked potential reveals neural correlates of the items encoded into visual working memory.
    Peterson DJ; Gurariy G; Dimotsantos GG; Arciniega H; Berryhill ME; Caplovitz GP
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Oct; 63():145-53. PubMed ID: 25173712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lacking control over the trade-off between quality and quantity in visual short-term memory.
    Murray AM; Nobre AC; Astle DE; Stokes MG
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e41223. PubMed ID: 22905099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The power law of visual working memory characterizes attention engagement.
    Smith PL; Corbett EA; Lilburn SD; Kyllingsbæk S
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Apr; 125(3):435-451. PubMed ID: 29733667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Separating the effects of visual working memory load and attentional zoom on selective attention.
    Lee H; Jeong SK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):502-511. PubMed ID: 32162967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induced and Evoked Human Electrophysiological Correlates of Visual Working Memory Set-Size Effects at Encoding.
    Gurariy G; Killebrew KW; Berryhill ME; Caplovitz GP
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0167022. PubMed ID: 27902738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Memory facilitation for emotional faces: Visual working memory trade-offs resulting from attentional preference for emotional facial expressions.
    Lee HJ; Cho YS
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1231-1243. PubMed ID: 30977105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.