These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31218202)

  • 21. Regional differences in prolonged non-operative therapy utilization prior to primary ACDF surgery.
    Davison MA; Lilly DT; Eldridge CM; Singh R; Bagley C; Adogwa O
    J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 80():143-151. PubMed ID: 33099337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cost-effectiveness of circumferential fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: propensity-matched comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with anterior-posterior fusion.
    Jazini E; Gum JL; Glassman SD; Crawford CH; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Dimar JR; McGraw KE; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1969-1973. PubMed ID: 29705337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preoperative epidural injections are associated with increased risk of infection after single-level lumbar decompression.
    Yang S; Werner BC; Cancienne JM; Hassanzadeh H; Shimer AL; Shen FH; Singla A
    Spine J; 2016 Feb; 16(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 26235469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Davis BJ; Aaronson O; Devin C; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Aug; 15(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 21529203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost-Utility Analysis of Instrumented Fusion Versus Decompression Alone for Grade I L4-L5 Spondylolisthesis at 1-Year Follow-up: A Pilot Study.
    Alvin MD; Lubelski D; Abdullah KG; Whitmore RG; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):E80-6. PubMed ID: 26889996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Owens R; Karikari I; Agarwal V; Gottfried ON; Bagley CA; Isaacs RE; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 23231358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 22054639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
    de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perioperative outcomes, complications, and costs associated with lumbar spinal fusion in older patients with spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis.
    Ong KL; Auerbach JD; Lau E; Schmier J; Ochoa JA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Jun; 36(6):E5. PubMed ID: 24881637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A cost-utility analysis of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases.
    Liu K; Sun W; Lu Q; Chen J; Tang J
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(6):982-987. PubMed ID: 28807742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment for degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis.
    Harrop JS; Hilibrand A; Mihalovich KE; Dettori JR; Chapman J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22 Suppl 1):S75-85. PubMed ID: 25299263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts.
    Weinstein JN; Lurie JD; Tosteson TD; Zhao W; Blood EA; Tosteson AN; Birkmeyer N; Herkowitz H; Longley M; Lenke L; Emery S; Hu SS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1295-304. PubMed ID: 19487505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The necessity and risk factors of subsequent fusion after decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5 years follow-up in two different large populations.
    Urakawa H; Jones T; Samuel A; Vaishnav AS; Othman Y; Virk S; Katsuura Y; Iyer S; McAnany S; Albert T; Gang CH; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1566-1572. PubMed ID: 32417500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Ghogawala Z; Dziura J; Butler WE; Dai F; Terrin N; Magge SN; Coumans JV; Harrington JF; Amin-Hanjani S; Schwartz JS; Sonntag VK; Barker FG; Benzel EC
    N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1424-34. PubMed ID: 27074067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Decompression With or Without Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis: A Cost Minimization Analysis.
    Ziino C; Mertz K; Hu S; Kamal R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Mar; 45(5):325-332. PubMed ID: 32045402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry.
    Mummaneni PV; Whitmore RG; Curran JN; Ziewacz JE; Wadhwa R; Shaffrey CI; Asher AL; Heary RF; Cheng JS; Hurlbert RJ; Douglas AF; Smith JS; Malhotra NR; Dante SJ; Magge SN; Kaiser MG; Abbed KM; Resnick DK; Ghogawala Z
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Jun; 36(6):E3. PubMed ID: 24881635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cost utility analysis of caudal epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, axial or discogenic low back pain, central spinal stenosis, and post lumbar surgery syndrome.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Pampati V; Cash KA; Benyamin RM; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2013; 16(3):E129-43. PubMed ID: 23703415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 27285666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost-utility of lumbar decompression with or without fusion for patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Kim S; Mortaz Hedjri S; Coyte PC; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 22169001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.