These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 312188)

  • 41. Implantation of multiple intracochlear electrodes for rehabilitation of total deafness: preliminary report.
    Chouard CH; MacLeod P
    Laryngoscope; 1976 Nov; 86(11):1743-51. PubMed ID: 979501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Experience with electrostimulation of the acoustic nerve before cochlea implantation].
    Hoth S; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):199-207. PubMed ID: 2054026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The University of Melbourne--nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant.
    Clark GM; Blamey PJ; Brown AM; Gusby PA; Dowell RC; Franz BK; Pyman BC; Shepherd RK; Tong YC; Webb RL
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1987; 38():V-IX, 1-181. PubMed ID: 3318305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Letter: Significance of cochlear nerve electric stimulation in totally deaf patients].
    Burian K
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1975 Jun; 54(6):530-1. PubMed ID: 125832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Hearing due to electrical stimulation of the auditory system.
    Clark GM
    Med J Aust; 1969 Jun; 1(26):1346-8. PubMed ID: 5797163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Electrical stimulation of hearing by implanted cochlear electrodes in humans.
    Spillmann T; Dillier N; Güntensperger J
    Appl Neurophysiol; 1982; 45(1-2):32-7. PubMed ID: 6895819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A prosthesis for the deaf based on cortical stimulation.
    Dobelle WH; Stensaas SS; Mladejovsky MG; Smith JB
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1973; 82(4):445-63. PubMed ID: 4599388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The clinical assessment of cochlear implant patients.
    Clark GM; O'Laughlin BJ; Rickards FW; Tong YC; Williams AJ
    J Laryngol Otol; 1977 Aug; 91(8):697-708. PubMed ID: 894122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Two-component hearing sensations produced by two-electrode stimulation in the cochlea of a deaf patient.
    Tong YC; Dowell RC; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    Science; 1983 Feb; 219(4587):993-4. PubMed ID: 6823564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Neural prostheses.
    Hambrecht FT
    Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng; 1979; 8():239-67. PubMed ID: 383002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [TRANSMISSION OF HEARING BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE ACOUSTIC NERVE. (PRELIMINARY REPORT)].
    ZOELLNER F; KEIDEL WD
    Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1963 Sep; 181():216-23. PubMed ID: 14093858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The galvanic treatment of deafness and the trials at the Berlin Royal Deaf-Mute Asylum in 1802.
    Söderfeldt Y
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 May; 270(6):1953-8. PubMed ID: 23283242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Aspects of various forms of current in electric stimulation].
    Konings L
    J Belge Med Phys Rehabil; 1980; 3(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 9139037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Transdermal electrostimulation therapy. Lack of therapeutic effect.
    Gerken GM; Glorig A; Roeser R
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1974 Aug; 100(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 4602014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Therapeutic applicability of low-frequency square current to the severe deafness].
    TAKEDA S; SUMITA S; IKOMA T; NAKAO G; KINOSHITA K; ENOMOTO T
    No To Shinkei; 1961 Feb; 13():105-13. PubMed ID: 13774957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Transdermal therapy and monosyllabic word discrimination.
    Glattke TJ; Simmons FB
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1974 Aug; 100(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 4602013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Transdermal electrostimulation in sensory hearing loss.
    Hughes EC; Arthur RH; Whitaker CW
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1974 Aug; 100(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 4602015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The ongoing debate of the utility of magnetic resonance imaging conditional neuromodulation devices.
    Falowski SM
    Neuromodulation; 2015 Jun; 18(4):337-8. PubMed ID: 26032936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Cancer therapy by direct current electricity].
    Kumasaki T
    Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi; 1987 Jun; 54(3):131. PubMed ID: 3497166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of stimulation of posterior cerebellum on neurological disease.
    Cooper IS
    Lancet; 1973 Jun; 1(7815):1321. PubMed ID: 4126111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.