These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31219173)

  • 1. Constructing 'exceptionality': a neglected aspect of NHS rationing.
    Hughes D; Doheny S
    Sociol Health Illn; 2019 Nov; 41(8):1600-1617. PubMed ID: 31219173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The concept of exceptionality: a legal farce?
    Ford A
    Med Law Rev; 2012; 20(3):304-36. PubMed ID: 22389444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deliberating Tarceva: A case study of how British NHS managers decide whether to purchase a high-cost drug in the shadow of NICE guidance.
    Hughes D; Doheny S
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 Nov; 73(10):1460-8. PubMed ID: 22000765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are high-cost drug funding mechanisms fit for purpose? A retrospective study of individual funding requests in an NHS tertiary hospital.
    Sanghvi S; Allen R; Cho S; Ferner RE; Urquhart R; Sofat R
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2023 Jan; 89(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 32501602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 'Cosmetic boob jobs' or evidence-based breast surgery: an interpretive policy analysis of the rationing of 'low value' treatments in the English National Health Service.
    Russell J; Swinglehurst D; Greenhalgh T
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Sep; 14():413. PubMed ID: 25240484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accountability for reasonableness: the relevance, or not, of exceptionality in resource allocation.
    Ford A
    Med Health Care Philos; 2015 May; 18(2):217-27. PubMed ID: 25227425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis and formulary decision making in England: findings from research.
    Williams IP; Bryan S
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Nov; 65(10):2116-29. PubMed ID: 17698271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Still Elegantly Muddling Through? NICE and Uncertainty in Decision Making About the Rationing of Expensive Medicines in England.
    Calnan M; Hashem F; Brown P
    Int J Health Serv; 2017 Jul; 47(3):571-594. PubMed ID: 28114872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Doing evidence-based medicine? How NHS managers ration high-cost drugs.
    Hughes D; Doheny S
    Soc Sci Med; 2019 Aug; 235():112304. PubMed ID: 31306883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Affordability as a discursive accomplishment in a changing National Health Service.
    Russell J; Greenhalgh T
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Dec; 75(12):2463-71. PubMed ID: 23103349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Being 'rational' and being 'human': How National Health Service rationing decisions are constructed as rational by resource allocation panels.
    Russell J; Greenhalgh T
    Health (London); 2014 Sep; 18(5):441-57. PubMed ID: 24287296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enacting localist health policy in the English NHS: the 'governing assemblage' of Clinical Commissioning Groups.
    Hammond J; Coleman A; Checkland K
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2018 Jan; 23(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 29256272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary care groups and NHS rationing: implications of the Child B Case.
    Pickard S; Sheaff R
    Health Care Anal; 1999; 7(1):37-56. PubMed ID: 10539450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deciding how NHS money is spent: a survey of general public and medical views.
    Lees A; Scott N; Scott SN; MacDonald S; Campbell C
    Health Expect; 2002 Mar; 5(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11906541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On being NICE in the UK: guidelines for technology appraisal for the NHS in England and Wales.
    Birch S; Gafni A
    Health Econ; 2002 Apr; 11(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 11921316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-making?
    Devlin N; Appleby J; Parkin D
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Jul; 8(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12869346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How are clinical commissioning groups managing conflicts of interest under primary care co-commissioning in England? A qualitative analysis.
    Moran V; Allen P; McDermott I; Checkland K; Warwick-Giles L; Gore O; Bramwell D; Coleman A
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e018422. PubMed ID: 29122801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.
    New B
    BMJ; 1996 Jun; 312(7046):1593-601. PubMed ID: 8664673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rationing health care. Cost effectiveness should not be the only criterion in deciding on treatment.
    St Leger MF
    BMJ; 1997 Jun; 314(7098):1901. PubMed ID: 9224141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complexity in the new NHS: longitudinal case studies of CCGs in England.
    Checkland K; McDermott I; Coleman A; Perkins N
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e010199. PubMed ID: 26743708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.