These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31219286)

  • 1. Temporal reproduction within and across senses: Testing the supramodal property of the pacemaker-counter model.
    Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1218-1235. PubMed ID: 31219286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supramodal representation of temporal priors calibrates interval timing.
    Zhang H; Zhou X
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Aug; 118(2):1244-1256. PubMed ID: 28615342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Larger visual stimuli are perceived to last longer from time to time: The internal clock is not affected by nontemporal visual stimulus size.
    Rammsayer TH; Verner M
    J Vis; 2015 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 25758710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossmodal temporal discrimination: assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker-counter model.
    Ulrich R; Nitschke J; Rammsayer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1140-52. PubMed ID: 17355038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation Affects Temporal Ventriloquism.
    Orchard-Mills E; Van der Burg E; Alais D
    Perception; 2016 Apr; 45(4):409-24. PubMed ID: 26655643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis.
    Rammsayer T; Pichelmann S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2364-2377. PubMed ID: 30362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory and visual temporal sensitivity: evidence for a hierarchical structure of modality-specific and modality-independent levels of temporal information processing.
    Stauffer CC; Haldemann J; Troche SJ; Rammsayer TH
    Psychol Res; 2012 Jan; 76(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 21461936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The consistency of crossmodal synchrony perception across the visual, auditory, and tactile senses.
    Machulla TK; Di Luca M; Ernst MO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1026-38. PubMed ID: 27045320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal sequence discrimination within and across senses: do we really hear what we see?
    Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3089-3098. PubMed ID: 31541284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probability-driven and stimulus-driven orienting of attention to time and sensory modality.
    Menceloglu M; Grabowecky M; Suzuki S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2732-2744. PubMed ID: 31254259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus order on comparative judgments across stimulus attributes and sensory modalities.
    Ellinghaus R; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29309193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fast transfer of crossmodal time interval training.
    Chen L; Zhou X
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 232(6):1855-64. PubMed ID: 24570386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A common representation of time across visual and auditory modalities.
    Barne LC; Sato JR; de Camargo RY; Claessens PME; Caetano MS; Cravo AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Oct; 119():223-232. PubMed ID: 30142377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representations of temporal information in short-term memory: Are they modality-specific?
    Bratzke D; Quinn KR; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Oct; 170():163-7. PubMed ID: 27518834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined effects of motor response, sensory modality, and stimulus intensity on temporal reproduction.
    Indraccolo A; Spence C; Vatakis A; Harrar V
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1189-98. PubMed ID: 25869739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus spacing effects in duration perception are larger for auditory stimuli: data and a model.
    Penney TB; Brown GD; Wong JK
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():97-104. PubMed ID: 23978665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Splitting time: Sound-induced illusory visual temporal fission and fusion.
    Boyce WP; Whiteford S; Curran W; Freegard G; Weidemann CT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Feb; 46(2):172-201. PubMed ID: 31985252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.