These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31219303)

  • 1. Measuring task set preparation versus mind wandering using pupillometry.
    Hutchison KA; Moffitt CC; Hart K; Hood AVB; Watson JM; Marchak FM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):280-295. PubMed ID: 31219303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patience is a virtue: Individual differences in cue-evoked pupil responses under temporal certainty.
    Hood AVB; Hart KM; Marchak FM; Hutchison KA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1286-1303. PubMed ID: 35396616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Window to the wandering mind: pupillometry of spontaneous thought while reading.
    Franklin MS; Broadway JM; Mrazek MD; Smallwood J; Schooler JW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2289-94. PubMed ID: 24313285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 18(4):638-664. PubMed ID: 29654476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The wandering self: Tracking distracting self-generated thought in a cognitively demanding context.
    Huijser S; van Vugt MK; Taatgen NA
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Feb; 58():170-185. PubMed ID: 29275845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response time as a proxy of ongoing mental state: A combined fMRI and pupillometry study in Generalized Anxiety Disorder.
    Makovac E; Fagioli S; Watson DR; Meeten F; Smallwood J; Critchley HD; Ottaviani C
    Neuroimage; 2019 May; 191():380-391. PubMed ID: 30798009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A closer look at the timecourse of mind wandering: Pupillary responses and behaviour.
    Pelagatti C; Binda P; Vannucci M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0226792. PubMed ID: 32353028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting task-general mind-wandering with EEG.
    Jin CY; Borst JP; van Vugt MK
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 19(4):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 30850931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of automation on mind wandering frequency in sustained attention.
    Gouraud J; Delorme A; Berberian B
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Nov; 66():54-64. PubMed ID: 30396034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mind wandering in sentence reading: decoupling the link between mind and eye.
    Foulsham T; Farley J; Kingstone A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Mar; 67(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 23458551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probing the neural signature of mind wandering with simultaneous fMRI-EEG and pupillometry.
    Groot JM; Boayue NM; Csifcsák G; Boekel W; Huster R; Forstmann BU; Mittner M
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 224():117412. PubMed ID: 33011417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of content and intensity of thought on behavioral and pupil changes during active mind-wandering, off-focus, and on-task states.
    Jubera-García E; Gevers W; Van Opstal F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1125-1135. PubMed ID: 31515772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory.
    Krimsky M; Forster DE; Llabre MM; Jha AP
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():84-90. PubMed ID: 28865286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The validity of the online thought-probing procedure of mind wandering is not threatened by variations of probe rate and probe framing.
    Schubert AL; Frischkorn GT; Rummel J
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):1846-1856. PubMed ID: 31049656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When attention wanders: Pupillometric signatures of fluctuations in external attention.
    Konishi M; Brown K; Battaglini L; Smallwood J
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():16-26. PubMed ID: 28645038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conjoint influence of mind-wandering and sleepiness on task performance.
    Stawarczyk D; D'Argembeau A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1587-1600. PubMed ID: 27268466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupillary correlates of lapses of sustained attention.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 16(4):601-15. PubMed ID: 27038165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of thought probes on performance: Does the mind wander more if you ask it?
    Wiemers EA; Redick TS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):367-373. PubMed ID: 30225780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are you mind-wandering, or is your mind on task? The effect of probe framing on mind-wandering reports.
    Weinstein Y; De Lima HJ; van der Zee T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):754-760. PubMed ID: 28577275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mind wandering and the attention network system.
    Gonçalves ÓF; Rêgo G; Oliveira-Silva P; Leite J; Carvalho S; Fregni F; Amaro E; Boggio PS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():49-54. PubMed ID: 27886519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.