274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31220381)
41. Correlation of radiographic and manometric findings in patients with ineffective esophageal motility.
Shakespear JS; Blom D; Huprich JE; Peters JH
Surg Endosc; 2004 Mar; 18(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 14716540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Improves Stratification of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Patients into Clinically Meaningful Subtypes: A Two-Center International Study.
Carmel M; Cohen DL; Hijazi B; Azzam N; Khoury T; Pagliaro M; Pesce M; Mari A
Dysphagia; 2024 Jun; 39(3):444-451. PubMed ID: 37934251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Ineffective esophageal motility in Chicago Classification version 4.0 better predicts abnormal acid exposure.
Zhuang QJ; Tan ND; Zhang MY; Chen SF; Luo Y; Xiao YL
Esophagus; 2022 Jan; 19(1):197-203. PubMed ID: 34378104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Contraction Reserve With Ineffective Esophageal Motility on Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry is Associated With Lower Acid Exposure Times Compared With Absent Contraction Reserve.
Quader F; Rogers B; Sievers T; Mumtaz S; Lee M; Lu T; Gyawali CP
Am J Gastroenterol; 2020 Dec; 115(12):1981-1988. PubMed ID: 32826576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. In ineffective esophageal motility, failed swallows are more functionally relevant than weak swallows.
Jain A; Baker JR; Chen JW
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2018 Jun; 30(6):e13297. PubMed ID: 29368366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Spectrum of esophageal dysmotility in systemic sclerosis on high-resolution esophageal manometry as defined by Chicago classification.
Aggarwal N; Lopez R; Gabbard S; Wadhwa N; Devaki P; Thota PN
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Dec; 30(12):1-6. PubMed ID: 28881879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in typical and atypical GERD: roles of gastroesophageal acid refluxes and esophageal motility.
Patcharatrakul T; Gonlachanvit S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Feb; 29(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 23926926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of esophageal function in patients with esophageal motor abnormalities using multichannel intraluminal impedance esophageal manometry.
Cho YK; Choi MG; Park JM; Oh JH; Paik CN; Lee JW; Lee IS; Kim SW; Chung IS
World J Gastroenterol; 2006 Oct; 12(39):6349-54. PubMed ID: 17072960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Is all ineffective esophageal motility the same? A clinical and high-frequency intraluminal US study.
Kim JH; Rhee PL; Son HJ; Song KJ; Kim JJ; Rhee JC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Sep; 68(3):422-31. PubMed ID: 18378232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [The relationship between acid reflux and esophageal motility, esophagitis and cardiac morphology in gastroesophageal reflux disease].
Hu ZW; Xu H; Zhan Y; Xin RH; Sun CY; Tian SR; Zhan XL; Chen D; Wang ZG; Wu JM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 99(44):3494-3499. PubMed ID: 31826568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Esophageal Body Motility for Clinical Assessment in Patients with Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms.
Jiang L; Ye B; Wang Y; Wang M; Lin L
J Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2017 Jan; 23(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 27599539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Esophageal motility and reflux characteristics in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with or without extra-esophageal symptoms].
Zhang YL; Zheng Y; Zhu HT; Wang HF; Du SY; Wang M; Lu KL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Nov; 98(44):3579-3583. PubMed ID: 30486573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Esophageal dysmotility as an important co-factor in extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux.
Knight RE; Wells JR; Parrish RS
Laryngoscope; 2000 Sep; 110(9):1462-6. PubMed ID: 10983943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Role of esophageal function tests in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Patti MG; Diener U; Tamburini A; Molena D; Way LW
Dig Dis Sci; 2001 Mar; 46(3):597-602. PubMed ID: 11318538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and patterns of reflux in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance.
Hoppo T; Komatsu Y; Jobe BA
Dis Esophagus; 2014 Aug; 27(6):530-7. PubMed ID: 23107023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Prevalence and clinical significance of esophageal motility disorders in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms.
Sikavi DR; Cai JX; Carroll TL; Chan WW
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Aug; 36(8):2076-2082. PubMed ID: 33373479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. How to Optimally Apply Impedance in the Evaluation of Esophageal Dysmotility.
Patel A; Gyawali CP
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2016 Nov; 18(11):60. PubMed ID: 27738965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux by Combined Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Monitoring and Esophageal Motility Patterns in Children with Esophageal Atresia.
Tong S; Mallitt KA; Krishnan U
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2016 Aug; 26(4):322-31. PubMed ID: 26445355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM): the primary finding in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder.
Leite LP; Johnston BT; Barrett J; Castell JA; Castell DO
Dig Dis Sci; 1997 Sep; 42(9):1859-65. PubMed ID: 9331148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Ineffective esophageal motility and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a close relationship?
Ergün M; Doğan İ; Ünal S
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2012; 23(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 23794296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
