154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31221212)
1. Usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages: a mixed method design.
Cleo G; Scott AM; Islam F; Julien B; Beller E
Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):145. PubMed ID: 31221212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey.
Scott AM; Forbes C; Clark J; Carter M; Glasziou P; Munn Z
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():80-94. PubMed ID: 34242757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review.
Khalil H; Ameen D; Zarnegar A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():22-42. PubMed ID: 34896236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation.
Harrison H; Griffin SJ; Kuhn I; Usher-Smith JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 31931747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews.
Hair K; Bahor Z; Macleod M; Liao J; Sena ES
BMC Biol; 2023 Sep; 21(1):189. PubMed ID: 37674179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module.
Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 4(1):6. PubMed ID: 25588387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references.
McKeown S; Mir ZM
Syst Rev; 2021 Jan; 10(1):38. PubMed ID: 33485394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani M; Hammady H; Fedorowicz Z; Elmagarmid A
Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 5(1):210. PubMed ID: 27919275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools.
Gates A; Guitard S; Pillay J; Elliott SA; Dyson MP; Newton AS; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):278. PubMed ID: 31727150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Software tools for literature screening in systematic reviews in biomedical research.
Van der Mierden S; Tsaioun K; Bleich A; Leenaars CHC
ALTEX; 2019; 36(3):508-517. PubMed ID: 31113000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 29316980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Introducing RAPTOR: RevMan Parsing Tool for Reviewers.
Schmidt L; Shokraneh F; Steinhausen K; Adams CE
Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):151. PubMed ID: 31242929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expediting citation screening using PICo-based title-only screening for identifying studies in scoping searches and rapid reviews.
Rathbone J; Albarqouni L; Bakhit M; Beller E; Byambasuren O; Hoffmann T; Scott AM; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 6(1):233. PubMed ID: 29178925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Gilbert SB; Hutton B
Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):143. PubMed ID: 31215463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automation tools to support undertaking scoping reviews.
Khalil H; Pollock D; McInerney P; Evans C; Moraes EB; Godfrey CM; Alexander L; Tricco A; Peters MDJ; Pieper D; Saran A; Ameen D; Taneri PE; Munn Z
Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38885942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a traditional systematic review approach with review-of-reviews and semi-automation as strategies to update the evidence.
Reddy SM; Patel S; Weyrich M; Fenton J; Viswanathan M
Syst Rev; 2020 Oct; 9(1):243. PubMed ID: 33076975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Shemilt I; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 8(1):57. PubMed ID: 30786933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews.
van Altena AJ; Spijker R; Olabarriaga SD
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 30561081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deduplicating records in systematic reviews: there are free, accurate automated ways to do so.
Guimarães NS; Ferreira AJF; Ribeiro Silva RC; de Paula AA; Lisboa CS; Magno L; Ichiara MY; Barreto ML
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 152():110-115. PubMed ID: 36241035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
Beller E; Clark J; Tsafnat G; Adams C; Diehl H; Lund H; Ouzzani M; Thayer K; Thomas J; Turner T; Xia J; Robinson K; Glasziou P;
Syst Rev; 2018 May; 7(1):77. PubMed ID: 29778096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
