These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31221267)

  • 21. Accuracy and usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve from computed tomographic coronary angiography: comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging, echocardiographic coronary flow reserve, and invasive fractional flow reserve.
    Taguchi E; Nakao K; Hirakawa K; Fukunaga T; Miyamoto S; Sakamoto T
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2017 Jan; 32(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26563118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A patient-specific virtual stenotic model of the coronary artery to analyze the relationship between fractional flow reserve and wall shear stress.
    Lee KE; Kim GT; Lee JS; Chung JH; Shin ES; Shim EB
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 222():799-805. PubMed ID: 27522378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Physiological Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis Depends on the Amount of Myocardial Mass Subtended by the Coronary Artery.
    Kim HY; Lim HS; Doh JH; Nam CW; Shin ES; Koo BK; Yoon MH; Tahk SJ; Kang DK; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Gwon HC; Lee SH; Kim EK; Kim SM; Choe Y; Choi JH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(15):1548-60. PubMed ID: 27423225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making.
    Tesche C; Vliegenthart R; Duguay TM; De Cecco CN; Albrecht MH; De Santis D; Langenbach MC; Varga-Szemes A; Jacobs BE; Jochheim D; Baquet M; Bayer RR; Litwin SE; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Schoepf UJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 120(12):2121-2127. PubMed ID: 29102036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.
    Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Feasibility of intracoronary frequency domain optical coherence tomography derived fractional flow reserve for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis.
    Zafar H; Sharif F; Leahy MJ
    Int Heart J; 2014; 55(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 24909988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. CT-based total vessel plaque analyses improves prediction of hemodynamic significance lesions as assessed by fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina pectoris.
    Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Jensen JM; Dey D; Bøtker HE; Ahmadi A; Achenbach S; Ko B; Nørgaard BL
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 29866619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
    Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Basic principles in the evaluation of coronary blood flow for the substantiation of novel diagnostic procedures. part 2. clinical use of fractional flow reserve].
    Terreshchenko AS; Zhirov IV; Cherkavskaia OV; Savchenko AP
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2012; (6):42-7. PubMed ID: 23520941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Coronary anatomy to predict physiology: fundamental limits.
    Johnson NP; Kirkeeide RL; Gould KL
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):817-32. PubMed ID: 24046379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of the State of Maximal Hyperemia in the Assessment of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve Using Non-Invasive Electrical Velocimetry.
    Murasawa T; Takahashi M; Myojo M; Kiyosue A; Oguri A; Ando J; Komuro I
    Int Heart J; 2017 May; 58(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 28539573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve: Methodology and evaluation of a point of care algorithm.
    Coenen A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono A; Dedic A; Chelu RG; Dijkshoorn ML; van Geuns RJ; Schoebinger M; Itu L; Sharma P; Nieman K
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 26747231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate-Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings.
    Nørgaard BL; Gormsen LC; Bøtker HE; Parner E; Nielsen LH; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Pedersen K; Terkelsen CJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Mæng M; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Lassen JF; Jensen JM
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 28862968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimized interpretation of fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography: Comparison of three interpretation methods.
    Takagi H; Ishikawa Y; Orii M; Ota H; Niiyama M; Tanaka R; Morino Y; Yoshioka K
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 30385326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CT-based myocardial ischemia evaluation: quantitative angiography, transluminal attenuation gradient, myocardial perfusion, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve.
    Koo HJ; Yang DH; Kim YH; Kang JW; Kang SJ; Kweon J; Kim HJ; Lim TH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32 Suppl 1():1-19. PubMed ID: 26667445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Virtual Resting Pd/Pa From Coronary Angiography and Blood Flow Modelling: Diagnostic Performance Against Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Papafaklis MI; Muramatsu T; Ishibashi Y; Bourantas CV; Fotiadis DI; Brilakis ES; Garcia-Garcia HM; Escaned J; Serruys PW; Michalis LK
    Heart Lung Circ; 2018 Mar; 27(3):377-380. PubMed ID: 28506646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.
    Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On tests, times, and the test of time..
    Achenbach S; Chandrashekhar Y; Narula J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1187-9. PubMed ID: 23153924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnosis of Coronary Disease and Icing on the Cake.
    Min JK; Chandrashekhar Y; Narula J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1117-1120. PubMed ID: 26381774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic performance of pressure drop coefficient in relation to fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve.
    Kolli KK; Arif I; Peelukhana SV; Succop P; Back LH; Helmy TA; Leesar MA; Effat MA; Banerjee RK
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 24791716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.