190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31221436)
1. A novel prognosis prediction model after completion gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: Development and validation using international multicenter databases.
Lu J; Zheng ZF; Zhou JF; Xu BB; Zheng CH; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Truty MJ; He QL; Huang CM
Surgery; 2019 Sep; 166(3):314-321. PubMed ID: 31221436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Novel Prediction Model of Prognosis After Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma: Development and Validation Using Asian Databases.
Woo Y; Son T; Song K; Okumura N; Hu Y; Cho GS; Kim JW; Choi SH; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
Ann Surg; 2016 Jul; 264(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 26945155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of clinicopathological features and prognosis analysis between carcinoma in the remnant stomach and gastric cancer].
Li F; Wang Y; Li C; Ma Y; Zhang Y; Li Z; Xue Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 21(5):529-534. PubMed ID: 29774934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nomograms for predicting survival in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who undergo palliative gastrectomy.
Ma T; Wu ZJ; Xu H; Wu CH; Xu J; Peng WR; Fan LL; Sun GP
BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):852. PubMed ID: 31462229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factor analysis of carcinoma in remnant stomach cancer at Peking University Cancer Hospital].
Wang Y; Li Z; Jin C; Ying X; Gao C; Wang Y; Xiao Q; Zhang Y; Chen Y; Zhang L; Ji J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 21(5):522-528. PubMed ID: 29774933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic Model Based on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Clinicopathological Factors to Predict Outcome of Patients with Node-Negative Gastric Cancer.
Qu JL; Qu XJ; Li Z; Zhang JD; Liu J; Teng YE; Jin B; Zhao MF; Yu P; Shi J; Fu LY; Wang ZN; Liu YP
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128540. PubMed ID: 26075713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. European validation of the Yonsei Gastric Cancer Prognosis Prediction Model after gastrectomy: Validation with the Netherlands Cancer Registry.
Brenkman HJF; Cho M; Ruurda JP; Song K; Son T; Kim HI; Noh SH; van Hillegersberg R; Hyung WJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):983-988. PubMed ID: 30654921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Integration and analysis of associated data in surgical treatment of gastric cancer based on multicenter, high volume databases].
Wang W; Sun Z; Deng J; Wang Z; Zhou Z; Liang H; Xu H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 19(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 26831882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Prognostic factors of lymph node-negative metastasis gastric cancer].
Sun D; Xu H; Huang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):190-194. PubMed ID: 28226354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center.
Zhao LY; Li CC; Jia LY; Chen XL; Zhang WH; Chen XZ; Yang K; Liu K; Wang YG; Xue L; Zhang B; Chen ZX; Chen JP; Zhou ZG; Hu JK
Oncotarget; 2016 Aug; 7(32):51069-51081. PubMed ID: 27363014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Staging for Remnant Gastric Cancer: The Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio vs. the UICC 7th Edition System.
Nakagawa M; Choi YY; An JY; Hong JH; Kim JW; Kim HI; Cheong JH; Hyung WJ; Choi SH; Noh SH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(13):4322-4331. PubMed ID: 27370654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. T stage and venous invasion are crucial prognostic factors for long-term survival of patients with remnant gastric cancer: a cohort study.
Matsuo K; Lee SW; Tanaka R; Imai Y; Honda K; Taniguchi K; Tomiyama H; Uchiyama K
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 19(1):291. PubMed ID: 34579733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Western Validation of a Novel Gastric Cancer Prognosis Prediction Model in US Gastric Cancer Patients.
Woo Y; Goldner B; Son T; Song K; Noh SH; Fong Y; Hyung WJ
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Mar; 226(3):252-258. PubMed ID: 29277711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Risk factor analysis and prediction model establishment of lymph node metastasis in remnant gastric cancer].
Wang W; Nie R; Zhou Z
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 21(5):541-545. PubMed ID: 29774936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of prognostic signatures in remnant gastric cancer through an interpretable risk model based on machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.
Zhan Z; Chen B; Cheng H; Xu S; Huang C; Zhou S; Chen H; Lin X; Lin R; Huang W; Ma X; Fu Y; Chen Z; Zheng H; Shi S; Guo Z; Zhang L
BMC Cancer; 2024 Apr; 24(1):547. PubMed ID: 38689252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Pathological staging criteria for carcinoma in the remnant stomach: an exploratory study].
Gao Z; Zhao X; Jiang K; Wang B; Li Y; Ye Y; Wang S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 21(5):514-521. PubMed ID: 29774932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival benefit of greater number of lymph nodes dissection for advanced node-negative gastric cancer patients following radical gastrectomy.
He H; Shen Z; Wang X; Qin J; Sun Y; Qin X
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jan; 46(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 26497044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Study on the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic difference of gastric stump cancer between non-anastomotic site and anastomotic site].
Chen L; Wei S; Ye Z; Wang Y; Zheng Q; Zhuo C; Xiao J; Zeng Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 20(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 28105623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
