These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31222556)

  • 1. Configurational contribution to the Soret effect of a protein ligand system : An investigation with density-of-states simulations.
    Luettmer-Strathmann J
    Eur Phys J E Soft Matter; 2019 Jun; 42(6):77. PubMed ID: 31222556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molecular Dynamics in Mixed Solvents Reveals Protein-Ligand Interactions, Improves Docking, and Allows Accurate Binding Free Energy Predictions.
    Arcon JP; Defelipe LA; Modenutti CP; López ED; Alvarez-Garcia D; Barril X; Turjanski AG; Martí MA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Apr; 57(4):846-863. PubMed ID: 28318252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ligand binding remodels protein side-chain conformational heterogeneity.
    Wankowicz SA; de Oliveira SH; Hogan DW; van den Bedem H; Fraser JS
    Elife; 2022 Mar; 11():. PubMed ID: 35312477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Feb; 50(2):262-73. PubMed ID: 20088605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of entropic contributions to binding in a "hydrophilic" versus "hydrophobic" ligand-protein interaction.
    Syme NR; Dennis C; Bronowska A; Paesen GC; Homans SW
    J Am Chem Soc; 2010 Jun; 132(25):8682-9. PubMed ID: 20524663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solvent effects on ligand binding to a serine protease.
    Gopal SM; Klumpers F; Herrmann C; Schäfer LV
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2017 May; 19(17):10753-10766. PubMed ID: 28116375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indirect readout in protein-peptide recognition: a different story from classical biomolecular recognition.
    Yu H; Zhou P; Deng M; Shang Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2022-32. PubMed ID: 24999015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wang-Landau sampling in face-centered-cubic hydrophobic-hydrophilic lattice model proteins.
    Liu J; Song B; Yao Y; Xue Y; Liu W; Liu Z
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Oct; 90(4):042715. PubMed ID: 25375531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thermal orientation and thermophoresis of anisotropic colloids: The role of the internal composition.
    Gittus OR; Olarte-Plata JD; Bresme F
    Eur Phys J E Soft Matter; 2019 Jul; 42(7):90. PubMed ID: 31312925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complementary Experimental Methods to Obtain Thermodynamic Parameters of Protein Ligand Systems.
    Mohanakumar S; Lee N; Wiegand S
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selected-fit versus induced-fit protein binding: kinetic differences and mutational analysis.
    Weikl TR; von Deuster C
    Proteins; 2009 Apr; 75(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 18798570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. (Thermo)dynamic role of receptor flexibility, entropy, and motional correlation in protein-ligand binding.
    Baron R; McCammon JA
    Chemphyschem; 2008 May; 9(7):983-8. PubMed ID: 18418822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dependency of ligand free energy landscapes on charge parameters and solvent models.
    Okamoto Y; Tanaka T; Kokubo H
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2010 Aug; 24(8):699-712. PubMed ID: 20495851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thermophoresis: The Case of Streptavidin and Biotin.
    Niether D; Sarter M; Koenig BW; Fitter J; Stadler AM; Wiegand S
    Polymers (Basel); 2020 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 32046223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rigid Residue Scan Simulations Systematically Reveal Residue Entropic Roles in Protein Allostery.
    Kalescky R; Zhou H; Liu J; Tao P
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Apr; 12(4):e1004893. PubMed ID: 27115535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using robotics to fold proteins and dock ligands.
    Brutlag D; Apaydin S; Guestrin C; Hsu D; Varma C; Singh A; Latombe JC
    Bioinformatics; 2002; 18 Suppl 2():S74. PubMed ID: 12385986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Entropic cost of protein-ligand binding and its dependence on the entropy in solution.
    Irudayam SJ; Henchman RH
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Apr; 113(17):5871-84. PubMed ID: 19351118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining methods for calculations of binding free energies: LRA, LIE, PDLD-LRA, and PDLD/S-LRA calculations of ligands binding to an HIV protease.
    Sham YY; Chu ZT; Tao H; Warshel A
    Proteins; 2000 Jun; 39(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 10813821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient Approximation of Ligand Rotational and Translational Entropy Changes upon Binding for Use in MM-PBSA Calculations.
    Ben-Shalom IY; Pfeiffer-Marek S; Baringhaus KH; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Feb; 57(2):170-189. PubMed ID: 27996253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial analysis and quantification of the thermodynamic driving forces in protein-ligand binding: binding site variability.
    Raman EP; MacKerell AD
    J Am Chem Soc; 2015 Feb; 137(7):2608-21. PubMed ID: 25625202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.