BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31222561)

  • 1. Determination of appropriate conversion factors for calculating size-specific dose estimates based on X-ray CT scout images after miscentering correction.
    Terashima M; Mizonobe K; Date H
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Sep; 12(3):283-289. PubMed ID: 31222561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of miscentering on patient dose and image noise in x-ray CT imaging: phantom and clinical studies.
    Habibzadeh MA; Ay MR; Asl AR; Ghadiri H; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2012 Jul; 28(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 21741870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new method for CT dose estimation by determining patient water equivalent diameter from localizer radiographs: Geometric transformation and calibration methods using readily available phantoms.
    Zhang D; Mihai G; Barbaras LG; Brook OR; Palmer MR
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3371-3378. PubMed ID: 29746705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Calculation of water equivalent diameter based on anteroposterior localizer CT images].
    Liang B; Fu Y; Cao M
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2020 Jun; 40(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 32895192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A SIMPLE METHOD FOR CALIBRATING PIXEL VALUES OF THE CT LOCALIZER RADIOGRAPH FOR CALCULATING WATER-EQUIVALENT DIAMETER AND SIZE-SPECIFIC DOSE ESTIMATE.
    Anam C; Fujibuchi T; Toyoda T; Sato N; Haryanto F; Widita R; Arif I; Dougherty G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Apr; 179(2):158-168. PubMed ID: 29136233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.
    Verellen D; Vinh-Hung V; Bijdekerke P; Nijs F; Linthout N; Bel A; Storme G
    Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10392823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
    van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic calculation of patient size metrics in computed tomography: What level of computational accuracy do we need?
    Sarmento S; Mendes B; Gouvêa M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):218-227. PubMed ID: 29265700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Organ dose calculation in CT based on scout image data and automatic image registration.
    Kortesniemi M; Salli E; Seuri R
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Oct; 53(8):908-13. PubMed ID: 22919053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part I. Development and validation of methods using the CT image.
    Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6764-71. PubMed ID: 23127070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased Computed Tomography Dose Due to Miscentering With Use of Automated Tube Voltage Selection: Phantom and Patient Study.
    Filev PD; Mittal PK; Tang X; Duong PA; Wang X; Small WC; Applegate K; Moreno CC
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2016; 45(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 26810714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation.
    Brady SL; Kaufman RA
    Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):832-40. PubMed ID: 23093679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of 320-detector-row volume scanning and AAPM report 111 CT dosimetry metrics on size-specific dose estimate: a Monte Carlo study.
    Haba T; Koyama S; Kinomura Y; Ida Y; Kobayashi M
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Sep; 39(3):697-703. PubMed ID: 27444155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT.
    Kaasalainen T; Palmu K; Reijonen V; Kortesniemi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 24951205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
    Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
    So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Upper limits of the photon fluence rate on CT detectors: Case study on a commercial scanner.
    Persson M; Bujila R; Nowik P; Andersson H; Kull L; Andersson J; Bornefalk H; Danielsson M
    Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4398. PubMed ID: 27370155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images.
    Wang J; Christner JA; Duan X; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6772-8. PubMed ID: 23127071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New weighting factor of weighted CTDI equation for PMMA phantom diameter from 8 to 40 cm: A Monte Carlo study.
    Haba T; Koyama S; Kinomura Y; Ida Y; Kobayashi M
    Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6603-6609. PubMed ID: 28960375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) for paediatric and adults patients based on a single slice.
    Abuhaimed A; Martin CJ
    Phys Med; 2020 Jun; 74():30-39. PubMed ID: 32403067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.