309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31222565)
1. Measurements of in-air spot size of pencil proton beam for various air gaps in conjunction with a range shifter on a ProteusPLUS PBS dedicated machine and comparison to the proton dose calculation algorithms.
Rana S; Samuel EJJ
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):853-862. PubMed ID: 31222565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parametrization of in-air spot size as a function of energy and air gap for the ProteusPLUS pencil beam scanning proton therapy system.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Dec; 13(4):392-397. PubMed ID: 33038003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of air gap, range shifter, and delivery technique on skin dose in proton therapy.
Kern A; Bäumer C; Kröninger K; Wulff J; Timmermann B
Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 48(2):831-840. PubMed ID: 33368345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improvements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy dose calculation accuracy in brain tumor cases with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm.
Widesott L; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Farace P; Schwarz M
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145016. PubMed ID: 29726402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commissioning and beam characterization of the first gantry-mounted accelerator pencil beam scanning proton system.
Kang M; Pang D
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3496-3510. PubMed ID: 31840264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nuclear halo measurements for accurate prediction of field size factor in a Varian ProBeam proton PBS system.
Harms J; Chang CW; Zhang R; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 31793202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of TPS calculation algorithms on dose delivered to the patient in proton therapy treatments.
Molinelli S; Russo S; Magro G; Maestri D; Mairani A; Mastella E; Mirandola A; Vai A; Vischioni B; Valvo F; Ciocca M
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(7):075016. PubMed ID: 30802887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine.
Kugel F; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Janson M; Kretschmer J; Brodbek L; Behrends C; Verbeek N; Looe HK; Poppe B; Timmermann B
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):529-541. PubMed ID: 36577626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PETRA: A pencil beam trimming algorithm for analytical proton therapy dose calculations with the dynamic collimation system.
Bennett LC; Hyer DE; Erhart K; Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Smith BR; Hill PM; Flynn RT
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7263-7280. PubMed ID: 37370239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of penumbra sharpening and scattering by adaptive aperture for a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system.
Grewal HS; Ahmad S; Jin H
Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1508-1519. PubMed ID: 33580550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A standardized commissioning framework of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems.
Chang CW; Huang S; Harms J; Zhou J; Zhang R; Dhabaan A; Slopsema R; Kang M; Liu T; McDonald M; Langen K; Lin L
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1545-1557. PubMed ID: 31945191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using field size factors to characterize the in-air fluence of a proton machine with a range shifter.
Shen J; Lentz JM; Hu Y; Liu W; Morales DH; Stoker JB; Bues M
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Mar; 12(1):52. PubMed ID: 28288673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of range shifter material on proton pencil beam spot characteristics.
Shen J; Liu W; Anand A; Stoker JB; Ding X; Fatyga M; Herman MG; Bues M
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1335-40. PubMed ID: 25735288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design and commissioning of the non-dedicated scanning proton beamline for ocular treatment at the synchrotron-based CNAO facility.
Ciocca M; Magro G; Mastella E; Mairani A; Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Russo S; Vai A; Fiore MR; Mosci C; Valvo F; Via R; Baroni G; Orecchia R
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1852-1862. PubMed ID: 30659616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical note: Evaluation and second check of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine for small-field apertures in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Holmes J; Shen J; Shan J; Patrick CL; Wong WW; Foote RL; Patel SH; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3497-3506. PubMed ID: 35305269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the range shifter model for proton pencil-beam scanning for the Eclipse v.11 treatment planning system.
Matysiak W; Yeung D; Slopsema R; Li Z
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):391-404. PubMed ID: 27074461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
