204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31222637)
1. Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.
Yanni F; Singh P; Tewari N; Parsons SL; Catton JA; Duffy J; Welch NT; Vohra RS
World J Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2483-2489. PubMed ID: 31222637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):674-684.e5. PubMed ID: 35249756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simple Technique of Circular Stapled Anastomosis in Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Singhal S; Kailasam A; Akimoto S; Masuda T; Bertellotti C; Mittal SK
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Mar; 27(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 27705608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil.
Campos GM; Jablons D; Brown LM; Ramirez RM; Rabl C; Theodore P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 20153660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Sozzi A; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Cavalli M; Cirri S; Campanelli G; Danelli P; Bona D
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3297-3309. PubMed ID: 36242619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy.
Li J; Wang B; Liang T; Guo NN; Zhao M
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Mar; 11(3):723-727. PubMed ID: 32017456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.
Xu QR; Wang KN; Wang WP; Zhang K; Chen LQ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 21484495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
