These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. A native annual forb locally excludes a closely related introduced species that co-occurs in oak-savanna habitat remnants. Johnson JC; Williams JL AoB Plants; 2020 Oct; 12(5):plaa045. PubMed ID: 33033590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Experimental evidence that evolutionary relatedness does not affect the ecological mechanisms of coexistence in freshwater green algae. Narwani A; Alexandrou MA; Oakley TH; Carroll IT; Cardinale BJ Ecol Lett; 2013 Nov; 16(11):1373-81. PubMed ID: 24112458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Determinants of individual foraging specialization in large marine vertebrates, the Antarctic and subantarctic fur seals. Kernaléguen L; Arnould JP; Guinet C; Cherel Y J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jul; 84(4):1081-91. PubMed ID: 25649011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Differential Responses of Two Ecologically Similar Case-Bearing Caddisfly Species to a Fish Chemical Cue: Implications for a Coexistence Mechanism. Okano JI; Tayasu I; Nakano SI; Okuda N Zoolog Sci; 2017 Dec; 34(6):461-467. PubMed ID: 29219044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Natural resilience in Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus: life history, spatial and dietary alterations along gradients of interspecific interactions. Hammar J J Fish Biol; 2014 Jul; 85(1):81-118. PubMed ID: 24754706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects revisited: a quantitative assessment of competition theory. Kaplan I; Denno RF Ecol Lett; 2007 Oct; 10(10):977-94. PubMed ID: 17855811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accounting for interspecific competition and age structure in demographic analyses of density dependence improves predictions of fluctuations in population size. Gamelon M; Vriend SJG; Engen S; Adriaensen F; Dhondt AA; Evans SR; Matthysen E; Sheldon BC; Saether BE Ecol Lett; 2019 May; 22(5):797-806. PubMed ID: 30816630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interspecific Contact and Competition May Affect the Strength and Direction of Disease-Diversity Relationships for Directly Transmitted Microparasites. O'Regan SM; Vinson JE; Park AW Am Nat; 2015 Oct; 186(4):480-94. PubMed ID: 26655572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Competitive interactions modify the temperature dependence of damselfly growth rates. Nilsson-Ortman V; Stoks R; Johansson F Ecology; 2014 May; 95(5):1394-406. PubMed ID: 25000770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stand dynamics and tree coexistence in an analytical structured model: the role of recruitment. Angulo Ó; Bravo de la Parra R; López-Marcos JC; Zavala MA J Theor Biol; 2013 Sep; 333():91-101. PubMed ID: 23707411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Competition-driven niche segregation on a landscape scale: Evidence for escaping from syntopy towards allotopy in two coexisting sibling passerine species. Reif J; Reifová R; Skoracka A; Kuczyński L J Anim Ecol; 2018 May; 87(3):774-789. PubMed ID: 29430650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does the evolution of ontogenetic niche shifts favour species coexistence? An empirical test in Trinidadian streams. Anaya-Rojas JM; Bassar RD; Matthews B; Goldberg JF; King L; Reznick D; Travis J J Anim Ecol; 2023 Aug; 92(8):1601-1612. PubMed ID: 36916855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Disentangling ecologically equivalent from neutral species: The mechanisms of population regulation matter. McPeek MA; Siepielski AM J Anim Ecol; 2019 Nov; 88(11):1755-1765. PubMed ID: 31330057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Lions and leopards coexist without spatial, temporal or demographic effects of interspecific competition. Miller JRB; Pitman RT; Mann GKH; Fuller AK; Balme GA J Anim Ecol; 2018 Nov; 87(6):1709-1726. PubMed ID: 30010193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]