112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31223124)
21. Pretreatment tables predicting pathologic stage of locally advanced prostate cancer.
Joniau S; Spahn M; Briganti A; Gandaglia G; Tombal B; Tosco L; Marchioro G; Hsu CY; Walz J; Kneitz B; Bader P; Frohneberg D; Tizzani A; Graefen M; van Cangh P; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; van Poppel H; Gontero P;
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):319-25. PubMed ID: 24684960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Oncological control in high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy compared to radiotherapy plus primary hormone therapy.
Caño-Velasco J; Herranz-Amo F; Barbas-Bernardos G; Polanco-Pujol L; Verdú-Tartajo F; Lledó-García E; Hernández-Fernández C
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019 May; 43(4):190-197. PubMed ID: 30878158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Wilt TJ; MacDonald R; Rutks I; Shamliyan TA; Taylor BC; Kane RL
Ann Intern Med; 2008 Mar; 148(6):435-48. PubMed ID: 18252677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Preoperative Prostate-specific Antigen Isoform p2PSA and Its Derivatives, %p2PSA and Prostate Health Index, Predict Pathologic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multicentric European Prospective Study.
Fossati N; Buffi NM; Haese A; Stephan C; Larcher A; McNicholas T; de la Taille A; Freschi M; Lughezzani G; Abrate A; Bini V; Palou Redorta J; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Lazzeri M
Eur Urol; 2015 Jul; 68(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 25139197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Correlation of Preoperative and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score: Examining the Predictors of Upgrade and Downgrade Results.
Pourmand G; Gooran S; Hossieni SR; Guitynavard F; Safavi M; Sharifi A; Mokhtari E
Acta Med Iran; 2017 Apr; 55(4):249-253. PubMed ID: 28532136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What is the optimal management of Gleason score 7 prostate cancer at biopsy? A comparison of disease control for prostatectomy versus radiotherapy.
Watkins JM; Watkins PL; Dufan TA; Koleilat N
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2015 Apr; 13(2):e73-7. PubMed ID: 25458369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Discrepancy between Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Abedi AR; Basiri A; Shakhssalim N; Sadri G; Ahadi M; Hojjati SA; Sheykhzadeh S; Askarpour S; Ghiasy S
Urol J; 2020 Aug; 18(4):395-399. PubMed ID: 32798231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prostate volume effect on Gleason score upgrading in active surveillance appropriate patients.
Çamur E; Coşkun A; Kavukoğlu Ӧ; Can U; Kara Ö; Develi Çamur A; Sarıca K; Narter KF
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2019 Jul; 91(2):. PubMed ID: 31266273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Follicle-stimulating hormone and the pituitary-testicular-prostate axis at the time of initial diagnosis of prostate cancer and subsequent cluster selection of the patient population undergoing standard radical prostatectomy.
Porcaro AB; Migliorini F; Petrozziello A; Sava T; Romano M; Caruso B; Cocco C; Ghimenton C; Zecchinini Antoniolli S; Lacola V; Rubilotta E; Monaco C; Comunale L
Urol Int; 2013; 90(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 23128438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of the diagnostic protocol and age on the prostate cancer incidence rate in Castilla y León according to the national registry 2010.
Gutiérrez-Pérez MI; González-Sagrado M; Conde-Vicente R; Amón-Sesmero JH
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2021 Jun; 45(5):383-390. PubMed ID: 34088438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Clinically predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy].
Zuo Q; Zhang F; Huang Y; Ma LL; Lu M; Lu J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Aug; 48(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29263497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang Z; Ni Y; Chen J; Sun G; Zhang X; Zhao J; Zhu X; Zhang H; Zhu S; Dai J; Shen P; Zeng H
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Feb; 18(1):42. PubMed ID: 32093688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, or External Beam Radiotherapy With Brachytherapy Boost and Disease Progression and Mortality in Patients With Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Cancer.
Kishan AU; Cook RR; Ciezki JP; Ross AE; Pomerantz MM; Nguyen PL; Shaikh T; Tran PT; Sandler KA; Stock RG; Merrick GS; Demanes DJ; Spratt DE; Abu-Isa EI; Wedde TB; Lilleby W; Krauss DJ; Shaw GK; Alam R; Reddy CA; Stephenson AJ; Klein EA; Song DY; Tosoian JJ; Hegde JV; Yoo SM; Fiano R; D'Amico AV; Nickols NG; Aronson WJ; Sadeghi A; Greco S; Deville C; McNutt T; DeWeese TL; Reiter RE; Said JW; Steinberg ML; Horwitz EM; Kupelian PA; King CR
JAMA; 2018 Mar; 319(9):896-905. PubMed ID: 29509865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 3+4 = 6? Implications of the stratification of localised Gleason 7 prostate cancer by number and percentage of positive biopsy cores in selecting patients for active surveillance.
Ruiz-Cerdá JL; Lorenzo Soriano L; Ramos-Soler D; Marzullo-Zucchet L; Loras Monfort A; Boronat Tormo F
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018 Mar; 42(2):103-113. PubMed ID: 28919101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is neutrophile to lymphocyte ratio a predictor of Gleason score upgrading according to risk classifications in patients with prostate cancer.
Karadağ S; Ekşi M; Özdemir O; Akkaş F; Arikan Y; Özlü DN; Çolakoğlu Y; Aliş D; Şahin S; Tuğcu V
Arch Esp Urol; 2021 Jul; 74(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 34219063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinicopathological characteristics and management of prostate cancer in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive population: experience in an Australian major HIV centre.
Ong WL; Manohar P; Millar J; Royce P
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():5-10. PubMed ID: 26315395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
